Cited by 146Elder Abuse and NeglectCybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is Psychological Vulnerability Related to the Experience of Fraud in Older Adults?

Open access

Abstract

Financial exploitation, and particularly thefts and scams, are increasing at an alarming rate. In this study we (a) determined the national prevalence of older adults who report having been a victim of fraud, (b) created a population-based model for the prediction of fraud, and (c) examined how fraud is experienced by the most psychologically vulnerable older adults. The older adults studied were 4,400 participants in a Health and Retirement Study substudy, the 2008 Leave Behind Questionnaire. The prevalence of fraud across the previous 5 years was 4.5%. Among measures collected in 2002, age, education, and depression were significant predictors of fraud. Financial satisfaction and social-needs fulfillment were measured in 2008 and were significantly related to fraud above and beyond the 2002 predictors. Using depression and social-needs fulfillment to determine the most psychologically vulnerable older adults, we found that fraud prevalence was three times higher (14%) among those with the highest depression and the lowest social-needs fulfillment than among the rest of the sample (4.1%; χ2 = 20.49; p < .001). Clinical gerontologists and other professionals in the field need to be aware of their psychologically vulnerable clients' heightened exposure to financial fraud.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07317115.2012.749323

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 22 references

4 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Blazer D.G., 2003, Medical Sciences, 58, 249
  2. Brandt J., 1988, Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 1, 111
  3. Lichtenberg P., 2011, Presented at Gerontological Society of America
  4. MetLife, 2009, Broken trust: Elders, family and finances
  5. MetLife, 2011, The MetLife Study of Elder Financial Abuse: Crimes of occasion, desperation and predation against America's elders
  6. 10.1007/s11205-004-0988-2 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Wallace R., 2000, Documentation of affective functioning measures in the Health and Retirement Study
  8. Welsh K. A., 1993, Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 6, 103

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–145 of 145

Metadata

Authors
Lichtenberg, P. A., Stickney, L., & Paulson, D.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Lichtenberg, Peter A.
Venue
Clinical Gerontologist
Published
2013-02-28
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
132-146
ISSN
  • 0731-7115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2301
OpenAlex
W2061349246
Cited by
146
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
FWCI
11.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (T32AG000275)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Law › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
fraud victimization, older adults, economic violence, psychological vulnerability, depression, financial satisfaction, fraud risk prediction, scams

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review