Cited by 235Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and TestingQuality of Life Measurement

Dimensions Of Well-Being And Their Measurement: The Spf-Il Scale

Nieboer, Anna, Lindenberg, Siegwart, Boomsma, Anne, Bruggen, Alinda C. Van.·2005·Social Indicators Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11205-004-0988-2

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nieboer, A., Lindenberg, S., Boomsma, A., & Bruggen, A. C. V.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Nieboer, Anna
Venue
Social Indicators Research
Published
2005-09
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
313-353
ISSN
  • 0303-8300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0921
OpenAlex
W2159229773
Cited by
234
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Indicators Research (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
Keywords
subjective well-being, well-being dimensions, affection, behavioral confirmation, status, comfort, stimulation, scale development, construct validity, content validity, test-retest reliability, measurement instruments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review