Cited by 56Cancer survivorship and careOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingWomen's cancer prevention and management

Relationship of optimism–pessimism and health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors

Petersen, Larra R., Clark, Matthew M., Novotny, Paul, Kung, Simon, Sloan, Jeff A., Patten, Christi A., Vickers, Kristin S., Rummans, Teresa A. +2 more·2008·Journal of Psychosocial Oncology

Abstract

Few studies have investigated the influence of optimism-pessimism in breast cancer survivors. This study used a retrospective design with 268 adult women who completed the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) as part of their medical care approximately 10 years prior to their breast cancer diagnosis and Medical Outcome Study Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36 or SF-12), on average, 8 years after diagnosis. MMPI pessimism scores were divided into quartiles, and t tests were used to determine differences between those highest and lowest in pessimism on health-related quality-of-life (QOL) measures, demographics, and disease status. The mean age at diagnosis of breast cancer was 63 years, and 74% had early-stage breast cancer. Patients age 65 years and older were significantly lower on physical health related QOL scales. There were no significant differences in health-related QOL scores by stage of disease. Patients with a pessimistic explanatory style were significantly lower on all of the health-related QOL scores, compared to those with a nonpessimistic style. Breast cancer survivors who exhibit a pessimistic explanatory style report lower health-related QOL for years after receiving a cancer diagnosis, compared to nonpessimistic women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07347330802359578

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petersen, L. R., Clark, M. M., Novotny, P., Kung, S., Sloan, J. A., Patten, C. A., Vickers, K. S., Rummans, T. A., Frost, M. H., & Colligan, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Published
2008-10-03
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
15-32
ISSN
  • 0734-7332 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7586
OpenAlex
W2069103888
Cited by
56
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosocial Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
optimism and pessimism, pessimistic explanatory style, health-related quality of life, breast cancer survivors, MMPI, SF-36, physical health, age at diagnosis, early breast cancer, psychosocial factors
MeSH terms
Affect, Attitude to Health, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Health Status, Humans, Middle Aged, Motivation, Personality Inventory, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review