The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms of Carbon Sequestration in Soil Aggregates
Abstract
Soil and crop management practices have a profound impact on carbon (C) sequestration, but the mechanisms of interaction between soil structure and soil organic C (SOC) dynamics are not well understood. Understanding how an aggregate stores and protects SOC is essential to developing proper management practices to enhance SOC sequestration. The objectives of this article are to: (1) describe the importance of plants and soil functions on SOC sequestration, (2) review the mechanisms of SOC sequestration within aggregates under different vegetation and soil management practices, (3) explain methods of assessing distribution of SOC within aggregates, and (4) identify knowledge gaps with regards to SOC and soil structural dynamics. The quality and quantity of plant residues define the amount of organic matter and thus the SOC pool in aggregates. The nature of plant debris (C:N ratio, lignin content, and phenolic compound content) affects the rate of SOC sequestration. Mechanisms of interaction of aggregate dynamics with SOC are complex and embrace a range of spatial and temporal processes within macro- ( > 250 μ m e.c.d.) and microaggregates ( < 250 μ m e.c.d.). A relevant mechanism for SOC sequestration within aggregates is the confinement of plant debris in the core of the microaggregates. The C-rich young plant residues form and stabilize macroaggregates, whereas the old organic C is occluded in the microaggregates. Interactions of clay minerals with C rich humic compounds in correlation with clay mineralogy determine the protection and storage of SOC. Principal techniques used to assess the C distribution in aggregates include the determination of total organic C in different aggregate size fractions, isotopic methods to assess the turnover and storage of organic C in aggregates, and computed tomography and X-ray scattering to determine the internal porosity and inter-aggregate attributes. The literature is replete with studies on soil and crop management influences on total organic C and soil aggregation. However, research reports on the interactions of SOC within aggregates for C sequestration are scanty. Questions still remain on how SOC interacts physically and chemically with aggregates, and research is needed to understand the mechanisms responsible for the dynamics of aggregate formation and stability in relation to C sequestration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils
TISDALL, J. M., & OADES, J. M. (1982) · Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x · Cited by 6,267
Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils
Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., & Paustian, K. (2002) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1016125726789 · Cited by 4,633
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930 · Cited by 2,215 · cited 4×
“Crop rotation effects on SOC sequestration are, however, altered by tillage (Lal, 2002), quantity and quality of organic residues (Chan and Heenan, 1999), type of crops (West and Post, 2002), and site-specific soil characteristics (Lal et al., 1997; Jarecki and Lal, 2003).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialManagement options for reducing CO2 emissions from agricultural soils
Paustian, K., Six, J., Elliott, E. T., & Hunt, H. W. (2000) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1006271331703 · Cited by 846
Soil structure and carbon cycling
Golchin, A., Oades, J., Skjemstad, J., & Clarke, P. (1994) · Australian Journal of Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr9941043 · Cited by 669
Carbon sequestration in croplands: the potential in Europe and the global context
Smith, P. (2004) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2003.08.002 · Cited by 569
Crop Management for Soil Carbon Sequestration
Jarecki, M. K., & Lal, R. (2003) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/713608318 · Cited by 396
Self-citationLal, R. (2003) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.562 · Cited by 127 · cited 6×
“Crop rotation effects on SOC sequestration are, however, altered by tillage (Lal, 2002), quantity and quality of organic residues (Chan and Heenan, 1999), type of crops (West and Post, 2002), and site-specific soil characteristics (Lal et al., 1997; Jarecki and Lal, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
Cited by
Carbon accumulation in agricultural soils after afforestation: a meta-analysis
LAGANIÈRE, J., ANGERS, D. A., & PARÉ, D. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01930.x · Cited by 956
Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: Theory and models across scales
Manzoni, S., & Porporato, A. (2009) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.031 · Cited by 788
Obia, A., Mulder, J., Martinsen, V., Cornelissen, G., & Børresen, T. (2016) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2015.08.002 · Cited by 488
Biochars influence seed germination and early growth of seedlings
Solaiman, Z. M., Murphy, D. V., & Abbott, L. K. (2012) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-011-1031-4 · Cited by 307
Ecosystem carbon budgeting and soil carbon sequestration in reclaimed mine soil
Shrestha, R. K., & Lal, R. (2006) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.001 · Cited by 228
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Blanco-Canqui, H., & Lal, R.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 481-504
- ISSN
- 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7836
- OpenAlex
- W2083355713
- Cited by
- 726
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 11.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of Carbon Sequestration in Soil Aggregates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07352680490886842
- The paper
- Blanco-Canqui, H., & Lal, R. (2004). Mechanisms of Carbon Sequestration in Soil Aggregates. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490886842
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.