Carbon sequestration in croplands: the potential in Europe and the global context
Abstract
Biospheric carbon sinks and sources can be included in attempts to meet emission reduction targets during the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol. Forest management, cropland management, grazing land management and re-vegetation are allowable activities under Article 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol. Soil carbon sinks (and sources) can, therefore, be included under these activities. In this paper, the role of croplands in the European carbon budget and the potential for carbon sequestration in European croplands are reviewed. The global context is then considered. Croplands are estimated to be the largest biospheric source of carbon lost to the atmosphere in Europe each year, but the cropland estimate is the most uncertain among all land-use types. It is estimated that European croplands (for Europe as far east as the Urals) lose 300 Mt C per year. The mean figure for the European Union is estimated to be 78 (S.D. 37) Mt C per year. There is significant potential within Europe to decrease the flux of carbon to the atmosphere from cropland, and for cropland management to sequester soil carbon, relative to the amount of carbon stored in cropland soils at present. The biological potential for carbon storage in European (EU15) cropland is of the order of 90-120 Mt C per year with a range of options available including reduced and zero tillage, set-aside, perennial crops and deep rooting crops, more efficient use of organic amendments (animal manure, sewage sludge, cereal straw…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This transfer of SOC to the atmosphere represents an opportunity for managing current greenhouse gas emissions through carbon sequestration.
“but also represents an opportunity for managing current greenhouse gas emissions through carbon sequestration [3].”
From Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia (2015) · cites this paper as [3]
Cites
Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems
Schimel, D. S., House, J. I., Hibbard, K. A., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Peylin, P., Braswell, B. H., Apps, M. J., Baker, D., Bondeau, A., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35102500 · Cited by 1,379 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., Janzen, H., Kumar, P., McCarl, B., Ogle, S., O’Mara, F., Rice, C., et al. (2007) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.06.006 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Self-citationLand-use intensity effects on soil organic carbon accumulation rates and Mechanisms
Grandy, A. S., & Robertson, G. P. (2007) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-006-9010-y · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Brandão, M., Milà i Canals, L., & Clift, R. (2011) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.10.019 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Washbourne, C.-L., Renforth, P., & Manning, D. A. C. (2012) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.037 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Soil organic carbon sequestration potential of cropland in China
Qin, Z., Huang, Y., & Zhuang, Q. (2013) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1002/gbc.20068 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Manning, D. A. C., Renforth, P., Lopez-Capel, E., Robertson, S., & Ghazireh, N. (2013) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.05.012 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Manning, D. A. C. (2008) · Mineralogical Magazine · doi:10.1180/minmag.2008.072.2.639 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Zimmermann, J., Dauber, J., & Jones, M. B. (2012) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01117.x · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Xiao, L., Zhou, S., Zhao, R., Greenwood, P., & Kuhn, N. J. (2020) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2020.106982 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia
Sanderman, J., Reseigh, J., Wurst, M., Young, M.-A., & Austin, J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136157 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Life cycle assessment of new willow cultivars grown as feedstock for integrated biorefineries
Krzyżaniak, M., Stolarski, M. J., Szczukowski, S., & Tworkowski, J. (2016) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-015-9681-3 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Thomas, A. R. C., Bond, A. J., & Hiscock, K. M. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01198.x · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Smith, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Pete
- ORCID
- Smith, Pete
- Venue
- European Journal of Agronomy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-236
- ISSN
- 1161-0301 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082057957
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 23.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Agronomy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Royal Society
- European Commission
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Keywords
- carbon sequestration, agricultural soils, soil carbon sink, Kyoto Protocol, carbon balance, carbon flux, land use change, reduced tillage, set-aside, perennial crops, organic amendments, crop rotation, energy crops, organic farming, greenhouse gas emissions reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review