The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current progress on the production, modification, and applications of bacterial cellulose
Abstract
Adoption of biomass for the development of biobased products has become a routine agenda in evolutionary metabolic engineering. Cellulose produced by bacteria is a "rising star" for this sustainable development. Unlike plant cellulose, bacterial cellulose (BC) shows several unique properties like a high degree of crystallinity, high purity, high water retention, high mechanical strength, and enhanced biocompatibility. Favored with those extraordinary properties, BC could serve as ideal biomass for the development of various industrial products. However, a low yield and the requirement for large growth media have been a persistent challenge in mass production of BC. A significant number of techniques has been developed in achieving efficient BC production. This includes the modification of bioreactors, fermentation parameters, and growth media. In this article, we summarize progress in metabolic engineering in order to solve BC growth limitation. This article emphasizes current engineered BC production by using various bioreactors, as well as highlighting the structure of BC fermented by different types of engineered-bioreactors. The comprehensive overview of the future applications of BC, aims to provide readers with insight into new economic opportunities of BC and their modifiable properties for various industrial applications. Modifications in chemical composition, structure, and genetic regulation, which preceded the advancement of BC applications, were also emphasized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wound repair and regeneration: Mechanisms, signaling, and translation
Eming, S. A., Martin, P., & Tomic-Canic, M. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337 · Cited by 3,562
Enzyme immobilisation in biocatalysis: why, what and how
Sheldon, R. A., & van Pelt, S. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60075k · Cited by 2,675
Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses
Habibi, Y. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60204d · Cited by 1,561
Production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic materials via the biochemical pathway: A review
Balat, M. (2011) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2010.08.013 · Cited by 1,420
Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage
Svensson, A., Nicklasson, E., Harrah, T., Panilaitis, B., Kaplan, D. L., Brittberg, M., & Gatenholm, P. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.049 · Cited by 1,026
Crystallographic snapshot of cellulose synthesis and membrane translocation
Morgan, J. L. W., Strumillo, J., & Zimmer, J. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11744 · Cited by 610
Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products, and functions
Römling, U., & Galperin, M. Y. (2015) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.005 · Cited by 573
Biosynthesis, production and applications of bacterial cellulose
Lin, S.-P., Loira Calvar, I., Catchmark, J. M., Liu, J.-R., Demirci, A., & Cheng, K.-C. (2013) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-013-9994-3 · Cited by 473
Self-citationBacterial cellulose as a material for wound treatment: Properties and modifications. A review
Sulaeva, I., Henniges, U., Rosenau, T., & Potthast, A. (2015) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.07.009 · Cited by 442
Lee, K.-Y., Buldum, G., Mantalaris, A., & Bismarck, A. (2014) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.201300298 · Cited by 435
Cited by
Kadier, A., Ilyas, R. A., Huzaifah, M. R. M., Harihastuti, N., Sapuan, S. M., Harussani, M. M., Azlin, M. N. M., Yuliasni, R., Ibrahim, R., Atikah, M. S. N., et al. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13193365 · Cited by 140
Bacterial Nanocellulose toward Green Cosmetics: Recent Progresses and Challenges
Almeida, T., Silvestre, A. J. D., Vilela, C., & Freire, C. S. R. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22062836 · Cited by 107
Bacterial cellulose in cosmetic innovation: A review
Lima, N. F., Maciel, G. M., Lima, N. P., Fernandes, I. D. A. A., & Haminiuk, C. W. I. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133396 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Blanco Parte, F. G., Santoso, S. P., Chou, C.-C., Verma, V., Wang, H.-T., Ismadji, S., & Cheng, K.-C.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-01-14
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 397-414
- ISSN
- 0738-8551 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7801
- OpenAlex
- W2999819052
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 109
- FWCI
- 7.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current progress on the production, modification, and applications of bacterial cellulose. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07388551.2020.1713721
- The paper
- Blanco Parte, F. G., Santoso, S. P., Chou, C.-C., Verma, V., Wang, H.-T., Ismadji, S., & Cheng, K.-C. (2020). Current progress on the production, modification, and applications of bacterial cellulose. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2020.1713721
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
