The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the Core Concepts of Media Richness Theory: The Impact of Cue Multiplicity and Feedback Immediacy on Decision Quality
Abstract
Employing media richness theory, a model is developed to open the black box surrounding the impact of computer-mediated communication systems on decision quality. The effects on decision quality of two important communication system factors, cue multiplicity and feedback immediacy, are examined in light of three important mediating constructs: social perceptions, message clarity, and ability to evaluate others. A laboratory experiment examining two tasks and employing face-to-face, electronic meeting, electronic conferencing, and electronic mail communication systems is used to assess the model's validity. Results provide consistent support for the research model as well as media richness theory. Richer media facilitate social perceptions (total socio-emotional communication and positive socio-emotional climate) and perceived ability to evaluate others' deception and expertise. Leaner media (electronic mail and electronic conferencing) facilitate communication clarity when participants have less task-relevant knowledge. The impacts of these mediating constructs on decision quality were found to depend on the levels of participant expertise and deception. In general, it was found that richer media can have significantly positive impacts on decision quality when participants' task-relevant knowledge is high. Moreover, effects of participant deception can be mitigated by employing richer media.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85 · Cited by 4,774
Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.10.1123 · Cited by 2,630
Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups.
Larson, J. R., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Keys, C. B. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.446 · Cited by 319
Cited by
Texas A&M International University, Kock, N., Lynn, G., & Stevens Institute of Technology (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00302 · Cited by 3,783
Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling
Christopher Westland, J. (2010) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2010.07.003 · Cited by 1,846
The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China
van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001 · Cited by 940
Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy
Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025 · Cited by 496
Jin, S. V., Ryu, E., & Muqaddam, A. (2021) · Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/jfmm-04-2020-0059 · Cited by 146
Online Purchase Intentions: An Empirical Testing of a Multiple-Theory Model
Järveläinen, J. (2007) · Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10919390701291000 · Cited by 86
Mental States: A Key Point in Scam Compliance and Warning Compliance in Real Life
Wen, X., Xu, L., Wang, J., Gao, Y., Shi, J., Zhao, K., Tao, F., & Qian, X. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19148294 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 263-299
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W2126035714
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 15.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.