Cited by 496Technology Adoption and User BehaviourDigital literacy in educationHuman Resource Development and Performance Evaluation

Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy

Mohammadyari, Soheila, Singh, Harminder·2015·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025

Cites

122 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H.
Affiliations
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Corresponding author
Singh, Harminder
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
82
Pages
11-25
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010456449
Cited by
496
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 9
FWCI
26.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Faculty of Business and Law, Auckland University of Technology (AUT)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Keywords
online learning, digital literacy, individual performance, effort expectation, performance expectations, continuance intention, UTAUT, Web 2.0 tools, accountant training, small and medium-sized enterprises, individual training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review