The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coordinating for Flexibility in e-Business Supply Chains
Abstract
The widespread use of information technology (IT) to create electronic linkages among supply chain partners with the objective of reducing transaction costs may have unintended adverse effects on supply chain flexibility. Increasing business dynamics, changing customer preferences, and disruptive technological shifts pose the need for two kinds of flexibility that interenterprise information systems must address--the ability of interenterprise linkages to support changes in offering characteristics (offering flexibility) and the ability to alter linkages to partner with different supply chain players (partnering flexibility). This study explores how enterprises in supply chains may forge supply chain linkages that enable both types of flexibility jointly, and allow them to deal with ubiquitous change. Drawing on March and Simon's coordination theory, we propose two design principles: (1) advance structuring of interorganizational processes and information exchange that allows partnering organizations to be loosely coupled, and (2) IT-supported dynamic adjustment that allows enterprises to quickly sense change and adapt their supply chain linkages. This study reports on a survey of 41 supply chain relationships in the IT industry. For design principle, our empirical investigation of factors shows (1) that modular design of interconnected processes and structured data connectivity are associated with higher supply chain flexibility, and (2) that deep coordination-related knowledge is critical for supply chain flexibility. Also, sharing a broad range of information with partners is detrimental to supply chain flexibility, and organizations should instead focus on improving the quality of information shared. For industry managers, the study provides clear insights for information infrastructure design. To manage their interdependencies, enterprises need to encapsulate their interconnected processes in modular chunks, and support these with IT platforms for information exchange in structured formats. Enterprises also need to nurture their execution capabilities by putting in place the information systems to process information exchanged with partners, augmenting their understanding of factors such as how partner actions need to trigger adaptive responses. For researchers, the study initiates a new stream of theorizing that focuses on the role of the information infrastructure in managing the tension between competing goals of offering flexibility and partnering flexibility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809 · cited 1×
“In contrast with the advance structuring pathway, the dynamic adjustment approach is expected to work better when resources have attributes (e.g., tacitness or social complexity) that make them difficult to share or transfer without close integration [32].”
BackgroundConventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective.
Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305 · Cited by 3,618
Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations
Ven, A. H. V. D., Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. (1976) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094477 · Cited by 1,979
Actualizing organizational memory with information systems
Stein, E. W., & Zwass, V. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.85 · Cited by 843
Cited by
Toward the development of a big data analytics capability
Gupta, M., & George, J. F. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.07.004 · Cited by 1,445
Lu, Y., & Ramamurthy, K. (. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409967 · Cited by 1,309
Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., & El Sawy, O. A. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148671 · Cited by 994
Self-citationWhy Do Customer Relationship Management Applications Affect Customer Satisfaction?
Mithas, S., Krishnan, M. S., & Fornell, C. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.201 · Cited by 776
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K.-H. (2012) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.571937 · Cited by 614
A Multidisciplinary Approach to Supply Chain Agility: Conceptualization and Scale Development
Gligor, D. M., Holcomb, M. C., & Stank, T. P. (2013) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1111/jbl.12012 · Cited by 313
Information Sharing for Supply Chain Management Based on Block Chain Technology
Nakasumi, M. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI) · doi:10.1109/cbi.2017.56 · Cited by 251
Wong, C. W. Y., Lai, K.-H., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2011) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222280305 · Cited by 188
Dynamic information technology capability: Concept definition and framework development
Li, T. (., & Chan, Y. E. (2019) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2019.101575 · Cited by 151
Integrating cloud computing in supply chain processes: A comprehensive literature review
Jede, A., & Teuteberg, F. (2015) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-08-2014-0085 · Cited by 65
Understanding commitment in business process outsourcing relationships
Chou, S. W., Techatassanasoontorn, A. A., & Hung, I. H. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.10.003 · Cited by 43
Hung, W.-H., Lin, C.-P., Tai, Y.-M., Ho, C.-F., & Jou, J.-J. (2014) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2013.837431 · Cited by 9
How Do Researchers (Re-)Use Design Principles: An Inductive Analysis of Cumulative Research
Schoormann, T., Möller, F., & Hansen, M. R. P. (2021) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_20 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- GOSAIN, S., MALHOTRA, A., & EL SAWY, O. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 7-45
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W1639732820
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 27.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.