Cited by 251Supply Chain and Inventory ManagementBlockchain Technology Applications and SecuritySustainable Supply Chain Management

Information Sharing for Supply Chain Management Based on Block Chain Technology

Nakasumi, Mitsuaki·2017·2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)

Abstract

Supply Chain Management systems provide information sharing and analysis to companies and support their planning activities. They are not based on the real data because there is asymmetric information between companies, then leading to disturbance of the planning algorithms. On the other hand, sharing data between manufacturers, suppliers and customers becomes very important to ensure reactivity towards markets variability. Especially, double marginalization is a widespread and serious problem in supply chain management. Decentralized systems under wholesale price contracts are investigated, with double marginalization effects shown to lead to supply insufficiencies, in the cases of both deterministic and random demands. This paper proposes a blockchain based solution to address the problems of supply chain such as Double Marginalization and Information Asymmetry etc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cbi.2017.56

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The data in Tables 5-7 highlight alignment of information sharing among supply chain actors as an objective achievable through blockchain adoption.

    “From the data in Tables 567, other important possible objectives, achievable through the adoption of the blockchain technology, can be highlighted: regulatory compliance in pharmaceutical supply chains [78], right supply-demand matching in agricultural supply chains [81], and alignment of information sharing among supply chain actors [83].”

    From A Review of Blockchain-Based Systems in Transportation (2019) · cites this paper as [83]

  • Some documents in macro-clusters C1 and C2 propose new platforms just at a concept level.

    “Some of them propose new platforms just at a concept level [45,51,52,75,77,83,84,88,89,91], some of them present proofs of their concepts [76,79,81], and only three of them present a real implementation based on real blockchains: [78,80,82].”

    From A Review of Blockchain-Based Systems in Transportation (2019) · cites this paper as [83]

  • The remaining papers of cluster C1 present platforms proposed only at a concept level.

    “The remaining papers of cluster C 1 present platforms that are proposed only at a concept level [45,75,77,83].”

    From A Review of Blockchain-Based Systems in Transportation (2019) · cites this paper as [83]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakasumi, M.
Affiliations
Komazawa University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nakasumi, Mitsuaki
Venue
2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-07
Pages
140-149
OpenAlex
W2748549281
Cited by
251
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 1
FWCI
42.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
blockchain, supply chain management, information sharing, double marginalization, information asymmetry, decentralized systems, wholesale price contract, stochastic demand, supply chain planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review