The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Problematic Use of Social Networking Sites: Antecedents and Consequence from a Dual-System Theory Perspective
Abstract
Problematic use of social networking sites (SNS) and its adverse consequences have become prevalent, yet little is known about the conceptualization and etiology of problematic use of SNS. This study draws on dual-system theory (DST), borrowed from cognitive neuroscience (also known as reflective-impulsive theory of the mind and fast and slow thinking) to investigate what drives this phenomenon. The statistical analyses of time-lagged data collected from 341 Facebook users implicate an imbalance between two systems in the human mind, involving strong cognitive-emotional preoccupation with using the SNS (System 1, impulsive) and weak cognitive-behavioral control over using the SNS (System 2, reflective), as the driver of problematic SNS use behaviors. Problematic use of SNS, in turn, diminishes users’ academic performance. This study contributes to research on the dark side of information systems (IS) use by conceptualizing problematic use and explaining its drivers and consequences. It demonstrates that the dual-system theory is an appropriate theoretical perspective for explaining problematic IS use, superior to planned-behavior–based models. It also explains some of the precursors of the dual system factors and offers practical implications to information technology artifact designers and users.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model1
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250921 · Cited by 8,767 · cited 3×
“We also adapted Bhattacherjee ’ s [10] instruments for measuring perceived usefulness of Facebook and satisfaction with using Facebook .”
MethodInfluentialHigh self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success
Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x · Cited by 6,557
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
Chaiken, S. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.752 · Cited by 5,516
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 · Cited by 5,137
Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3801_6 · Cited by 4,207
Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1 · Cited by 3,984
Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update
Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003 · Cited by 3,623
The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses
Butler, A. C., Chapman, J. E., Forman, E. M., & Beck, A. T. (2006) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.003 · Cited by 3,215
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.81 · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.81
- Andrews R.N., 2013, Institutional Transformation to Engage a Diverse Student Body, 67
- Bandura A., 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory
- 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752 · Paper page
- 10.1037//0022-3514.56.1.5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00332747.2000.11024893 · doi:10.1080/00332747.2000.11024893
- McCoy B.R., 2016, Journal of Media Education, 7, 5
- 10.1177/0009922816669790 · doi:10.1177/0009922816669790
- Tarafdar M., 2015, MIT Sloan Management Review, 56, 600
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00601 · DOI
- 2016, WolframAlpha
Cited by
Brand, M., Wegmann, E., Stark, R., Müller, A., Wölfling, K., Robbins, T. W., & Potenza, M. N. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.032 · Cited by 2,126
Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X., & Elbanna, A. (2019) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2019/13747 · Cited by 576
Sun, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106699 · Cited by 509
Fu, S., Li, H., Liu, Y., Pirkkalainen, H., & Salo, M. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102307 · Cited by 462
Brand, M., Rumpf, H.-J., Demetrovics, Z., MÜller, A., Stark, R., King, D. L., Goudriaan, A. E., Mann, K., Trotzke, P., Fineberg, N. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.2020.00035 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Turel, O., & Qahri-Saremi, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1087-1116
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W2587348257
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 63.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Problematic Use of Social Networking Sites: Antecedents and Consequence from a Dual-System Theory Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07421222.2016.1267529
- The paper
- Turel, O., & Qahri-Saremi, H. (2016). Problematic Use of Social Networking Sites: Antecedents and Consequence from a Dual-System Theory Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2016.1267529
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
