Cited by 576Information Systems Theories and ImplementationInformation Systems Education and Curriculum DevelopmentInformation Technology Governance and Strategy

The Sociotechnical Axis of Cohesion for the is Discipline: Its Historical Legacy and its Continued Relevance1

Sarker, Suprateek, Chatterjee, Sutirtha, Xiao, Xiao, Elbanna, Amany·2019·MIS Quarterly

Abstract

The sociotechnical perspective is often seen as one of the foundational viewpoints—or an “axis of cohesion”— for the Information Systems (IS) discipline, contributing to both its distinctiveness and its ability to coherently expand its boundaries. However, our review of papers in the two leading IS journals from 2000 to 2016 suggests that IS research has lost sight of the discipline’s sociotechnical character—a character that was widely acknowledged at the discipline’s inception. This is a problem because an axis of cohesion can be fundamental to a discipline’s long-term vitality. In order to address this issue, we offer ways to renew the sociotechnical perspective so that it can continue to serve as a distinctive and coherent foundation for the discipline. Our hope is that the renewed sociotechnical frame for the IS discipline discussed in the paper holds potential to contribute to the enduring strength of our diverse, distinctive, yet unified discipline. It also prompts members of the discipline to think more deeply about what it means to be an IS scholar.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.25300/misq/2019/13747

Cites

158 of 158 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X., & Elbanna, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • Copenhagen Business School (DK)
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2019-09-01
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
695-719
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
OpenAlex
W2967831706
Cited by
576
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 107 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 7
FWCI
91.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Keywords
socio-technical approach, information systems discipline, disciplinary identity, disciplinary boundaries, disciplinary renewal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review