Cited by 55Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Does psychache mediate the relationship between general distress and suicide ideation?

Open access
Campos, Rui C., Gomes, Margarida, Holden, Ronald R., Piteira, Margarida, Rainha, Ana·2017·Death Studies

Abstract

This study evaluated whether psychache (i.e., mental pain) mediates the association between general distress, assessed as the frequency and the intensity of psychological symptoms in the previous week, and suicide ideation in community adults. For a sample of 202 adults, psychache fully mediated the relationship between suicide ideation and the frequency of psychological symptoms, and partially mediated the relationship between suicide ideation and the intensity of psychological symptoms. As such, mental pain fully or partially explains the process linking the frequency and the intensity of general distress to suicide ideation and, thus, mental pain is a target for potential intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07481187.2016.1251510

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological pain mediated the association between frequency of psychological symptoms and suicidal ideation, and partially mediated the relationship between symptom intensity and suicidal ideation in a community sample.

    “Campos et al. [18] showed that psychological pain mediated the association between the frequency of psychological symptoms and suicidal ideation, and partially mediated the relationship between symptom intensity and suicidal ideation in a community sample.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campos, R. C., Gomes, M., Holden, R. R., Piteira, M., & Rainha, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Évora (PT)
  • Queen's University (CA)
Corresponding author
Campos, Rui C.
Venue
Death Studies
Published
2016-11-08
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
241-245
ISSN
  • 0748-1187 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7683
OpenAlex
W2551266856
Cited by
55
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Death Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
emotional pain, psychological suffering, suicidal ideation, general distress, psychological symptoms, symptom frequency, symptom intensity, mediation, community-dwelling adults
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Suicide, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review