Cited by 17Patient Satisfaction in HealthcarePsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints

Patient satisfaction and acute psychiatric inpatient treatment

Open access
Færden, Ann, Bølgen, Brita, Løvhaug, Lars, Thoresen, Christian, Dieset, Ingrid·2020·Nordic Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction (PS) with treatment is one of different outcome- and quality measures used by health care providers worldwide to improve service. We report from a study of patients admitted to the Department of Acute Psychiatry at the Oslo University Hospital where we investigated PS and difference between genders, days of hospital stay, diagnostic groups, voluntary—and involuntary admitted patients according to hospital records and perceived voluntary—and involuntary admittance.Materials and methods: All admitted patients during a 9-month period in 2014 were asked to participate by written consent. We used The Psychiatric Inpatient Questionnaire (PIPEQ), a self-report survey validated for assessment post-discharge. Analyses were conducted for a general dimension of PS and individual questions. A user representative was a part of the study from the beginning.Results: A total of 357 patients were asked and 256 consented. Results show that 68% were over all satisfied and 14% dissatisfied. Highest PS was found for cooperation with relatives and lowest for influence on choice of treatment and medication. We found no significant difference in PS between men and women, but patients with a personality disorder and with short stay were less satisfied. PS was significantly less for those perceiving involuntary admission regardless of legal status.Conclusion: The PIPEQ gives important input of patient’s experience with the delivery of care. Answers range from very much satisfied to not at all depending on what was asked for. Exploring PS provides valuable information for quality improvements for different patient groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08039488.2020.1764620

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All studies that examined patient knowledge of legal status found significant confusion among both people treated on an involuntary and voluntary basis regarding their legal rights or status.

    “All studies that examined patient knowledge of legal status found significant confusion among both people treated on an involuntary and voluntary basis regarding their legal rights or status (10–15).”
  • High degrees of perceived coercion were found among those receiving voluntary care.

    “As a result, perceptions of coercion were not necessarily related to objective legal status (12,33), with high degrees of perceived coercion found among those receiving voluntary care (11,13–15,27,29).”
  • Most literature indicates that people are less satisfied with involuntary care as measured by structured assessment tools.

    “In general, most literature indicates that people are less satisfied with involuntary care as measured by structured assessment tools including the Client Assessment of Treatment Scale or the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (10,13,66,104–110) and measures of humiliation and negative affective response (24,110,111).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Færden, A., Bølgen, B., Løvhaug, L., Thoresen, C., & Dieset, I.
Affiliations
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Diakonhjemmet Hospital (NO)
  • South-Eastern, Norway Regional Health Authority, Norway
Corresponding author
Færden, Ann
Venue
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2020-05-19
Volume
74
Issue
8
Pages
577-584
ISSN
  • 0029-1455 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-9488
  • 1502-4725
OpenAlex
W3026724490
Cited by
17
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nordic Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Keywords
patient satisfaction, involuntary admission, voluntary admission, gender differences, length of hospital stay, personality disorders, quality of psychiatric care, user representatives
MeSH terms
Aftercare, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Patient Admission, Patient Discharge, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review