Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review of Lithium Production and Recovery from Minerals, Brines, and Lithium-Ion Batteries

Meng, Fei, McNeice, James, Zadeh, Shirin S., Ghahreman, Ahmad·2021·Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review

Abstract

Rechargeable lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are widely employed in portable electric devices, electric vehicles (EVs), and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), indicating a potential increasing demand for LIBs over the next decade. Lithium, a critical element in LIBs, might encounter a potential supply crisis in the future. The irregular distribution of lithium mineral resources in countries and the unequal concentration in brine reserves also causes lithium extraction to be of critical importance. Today lithium is mainly recovered from minerals (especially spodumene) by acid, alkaline, and chlorination processes, and from brines by crystallization, solvent extraction, and ion-exchange processes. Regarding the secondary resources, i.e., recycling the spent LIBs, the recycling process consists of dismantling the LIBs, in some cases the separation of the cathode and anode materials, leaching of shredded material, and separation and recovery of metals. Nonetheless, the industry standard for recycling of LIBs currently is the pyrometallurgy processes, mostly are focused on the base metals recovery, such as cobalt and nickel, rather than lithium. Varying compositions of batteries for different applications require the development of a suitable and sustainable recycling process to recover metals from all types of LIBs. This paper provides a comprehensive review of lithium recovery processes that have already been studied and are currently in industrial practice, in the hope of providing some inspirations to explore new technologies for sustainable recovery of lithium from minerals, brines and LIBs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08827508.2019.1668387

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1055/s.0028.1105114 · doi:10.1055/s.0028.1105114
  2. 10.1094/PDIS.11.11.0999.PDN · doi:10.1094/pdis.11.11.0999.pdn
  3. Ekermo, V. 2009. Recycling opportunities for Li-ion batteries from hybrid electric vehicles. In: Master thesis. Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology.
  4. Garrett D. E., 2004, Handbook of lithium and natural calcium chloride their deposits, processing, uses and properties
  5. Hui Z., 2000, Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 17, 307
  6. 10.1094/PDIS.11.11.0999.PDN · doi:10.1094/pdis.11.11.0999.pdn
  7. Kogel, J. E., N. C. Trivedi, J. M. Barker, and S. T. Krukowski. 2006. Industrial minerals and rocks - commodities, markets, and uses. 7th Edition. USA: Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration (SME). Retrieved from https://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpIMRCMUE1/industrial-minerals-rocks/industrial-minerals-rocks
  8. Kondas J., 2006, Acta Metallurgica Slovaca, 12, 197
  9. Krebs, R. E. 2006. The history and use of our earth’s chemical elements: A reference guide. USA: Greenwood Press.
  10. 10.1094/PDIS.11.11.0999.PDN · doi:10.1094/pdis.11.11.0999.pdn
  11. 10.1179/1753555714Y.0000000170 · doi:10.1179/1753555714y.0000000170
  12. 10.1080/10667857.2016.1208957 · doi:10.1080/10667857.2016.1208957
  13. 10.1016/j.tca.2015.02.009 · DOI
  14. 10.1046/j.1469.1809.1999.6320101.x · doi:10.1046/j.1469.1809.1999.6320101.x
  15. Saloojee F. and Lloyd J. 2014. Lithium Battery Recycling Process. https://www.sagreenfund.org.za/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Lithium-Battery-Recycling-Literature-Review-CM-Solutions.pdf (accessed Sept. 23, 2019).
  16. Shuva M. A. H., 2013, American Journal of Materials Engineering and Technology, 1, 8
  17. 10.1016/0021-9673(95)00958-2 · doi:10.1016/0021-9673(95)00958-2
  18. Sojka R., 1998, In 4th INTERNATIONAL BATTERY RECYCLING CONGRESS, 1
  19. Tedjar F., 2013, Proc. International Battery Association (IBA2013)
  20. Tran, T., Van T. Luong. 2015. Chapter 3 - Lithium production processes, Lithium process chemistry: Resources, extraction, batteries, and recycling. Changes A. and Światowska J. ed., 1st Edition. Elsevier Science: pp. 81-124.
  21. 10.1179/17535557A15Y.000000007 · doi:10.1179/17535557a15y.000000007

Cited by

See all 398

Metadata

Authors
Meng, F., McNeice, J., Zadeh, S. S., & Ghahreman, A.
Venue
Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review
Published
2019-10-02
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
123-141
ISSN
  • 0882-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7401
OpenAlex
W2978974986
Cited by
398
References
65
FWCI
14.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2015-05718)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of Lithium Production and Recovery from Minerals, Brines, and Lithium-Ion Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08827508.2019.1668387
The paper
Meng, F., McNeice, J., Zadeh, S. S., & Ghahreman, A. (2021). Review of Lithium Production and Recovery from Minerals, Brines, and Lithium-Ion Batteries. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2019.1668387

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.