Cited by 62Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsCardiac Health and Mental HealthHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Alexithymia and cardiovascular risk in older adults: Psychosocial, psychophysiological, and biomedical correlates

Waldstein, Shari R., Kauhanen, Jussi, Neumann, Serina A., Katzel, Leslie I.·2002·Psychology & Health

Abstract

Psychosocial correlates of alexithymia were examined in 102 healthy, older adults (ages 53-83; 76% male). Alexithymic ( n = 26) and non-alexithymic ( n = 30) groups, defined by top ( S 70) and bottom ( h 54) quartiles of the distribution of Toronto Alexithymia Scale (26-item) scores, were compared with respect to psychosocial, psychophysiological, and biomedical risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Both categorical ratings and continuous scores of alexithymia were associated with significantly greater levels of trait anxiety, anger-in, neuroticism, hostility, perceived stress, depression, and lower levels of social support. Compared to non-alexithymics, alexithymics displayed significantly greater blood pressure responses to anger provocation and tended to have a greater percent body fat. The groups did not differ in resting cardiovascular parameters, heart rate reactivity, fasting glucose and lipoprotein lipids, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, social desirability, or trait anger. These findings suggest several psychosocial and psychophysiological pathways by which alexithymia may confer risk for cardiovascular disease among older adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870440290025803

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elevated alexithymia in older adults is associated with poor physical and mental health.

    “a body of evidence indicates that elevated alexithymia in older adults is associated with poor physical and mental health (Bamonti et al., 2010; Hintistan et al., 2013; Waldstein et al., 2002).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Waldstein et al., 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waldstein, S. R., Kauhanen, J., Neumann, S. A., & Katzel, L. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2002-01
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
597-610
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W2088634771
Cited by
62
References
54
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Institute on Aging
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
alexithymia, cardiovascular risk, older adults, cardiovascular risk factors, trait anxiety, anger-in, hostility, neuroticism, perceived stress, depression, social support, blood pressure reactivity, fat mass, psychosocial correlates, psychophysiological correlates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review