Cited by 56Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMedicine, History, and Philosophy

Alexithymia in a normal elderly population

Joukamaa, Matti, Saarijärvi, Simo, Muuriaisniemi, Marja-Liisa, Salokangas, Raimo K.R·1996·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of alexithymia in an elderly Finnish population sample. Associations between alexithymia and sociodemographic factors were investigated, together with the relationship between alexithymia and perceived somatic health and self-reported psychic health. The study forms a part of the Turun Vanhustutkimus (TUR-VA) project, which is a longitudinal, prospective follow-up study dealing with psychosocial adaptation to retirement and to old age. The study group consisted of a population sample of 72-year-old people (N = 190). Alexithymia was measured with the 26-item version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-26). The prevalence of alexithymia was 34%. Alexithymia was associated with poor perceived somatic health. Alexithymia was associated with having a psychiatric disturbance (measured by the 36-item General Health Questionnaire [GHQ-36]), but this relationship disappeared when the influence of perceived somatic health was controlled for. Alexithymia was not associated with gender, marital status, social status, or residential area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0010-440x(96)90576-3

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aging is associated with increased rates of alexithymia.

    “as well as increased rates of alexithymia (Joukamaa et al., 1996; Mattila et al., 2006; Paradiso et al., 2008 although see Gunzelmann et al., 2002).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Joukamaa et al., 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joukamaa, M., Saarijärvi, S., Muuriaisniemi, M.-L., & Salokangas, R. K. R.
Affiliations
Turku University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
Joukamaa, Matti
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-03
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
144-147
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091819437
Cited by
55
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
alexithymia, prevalence, older adults, self-rated mental health, psychiatric disturbances, sociodemographic factors, Toronto Alexithymia Scale
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Aged, Aging, Dementia, Female, Finland, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Prospective Studies, Psychometrics, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review