Cited by 33Burn Injury Management and OutcomesBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesEating Disorders and Behaviors

Perceived Stigmatization and Fear of Negative Evaluation: Two Distinct Pathways to Body Image Dissatisfaction and Self-Esteem in Burn Survivors

Open access
Willemse, Heidi, Geenen, Rinie, Egberts, Marthe R., Engelhard, Iris M., Van Loey, Nancy E.·2023·Psychology & Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Scars resulting from burn injury can pose social and psychological problems that may affect body image and self-esteem. This study aimed to investigate whether burn severity, age and female gender are associated with body image dissatisfaction and self-esteem, through an association with perceived stigmatization and fear or negative evaluation. DESIGN & MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Burn survivors (N = 224) completed the Fear of Negative Evaluation scale (FNE) and the Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire (PSQ) at 3 months post-burn, and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale (RSE) and the Satisfaction with Appearance scale (SWAP) at 6 months post-burn. Path analysis was used to test the relationships. RESULTS: Body image dissatisfaction and self-esteem were moderately associated. Burn severity was directly and indirectly associated with body image dissatisfaction through perceived stigmatization. Female gender and age were indirectly associated with body image dissatisfaction though fear of negative evaluation. Age was indirectly associated with both perceived stigmatization and fear of negative evaluation. Perceived stigmatization and fear of negative evaluation were associated with self-esteem through body image dissatisfaction, the first indirectly and the latter both directly and indirectly. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight that both burn-specific factors and psychological vulnerability should be taken into account to deal with social challenges that may affect body image and self-esteem after burns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870446.2021.1970160

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willemse, H., Geenen, R., Egberts, M. R., Engelhard, I. M., & Van Loey, N. E.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Department of Behavioural Research, Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Beverwijk, The Netherlands
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2021-08-26
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
445-458
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W3193623090
Cited by
33
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Dutch Burns Foundation (12.105, 17.102)
  • Nederlandse Brandwonden Stichting
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
burn scars, burn survivors, body dissatisfaction, self-esteem, perceived stigma, fear of negative evaluation, burn severity, gender differences, age differences, psychological vulnerability, appearance satisfaction
MeSH terms
Body Dissatisfaction, Fear, Female, Humans, Self Concept, Stereotyping, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review