Cited by 42Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (A-CRA) as a Model Paradigm for the Management of Adolescents with Substance Use Disorders and Co-Occurring Psychiatric Disorders

Godley, Susan H., Smith, Jane Ellen, Passetti, Lora L., Subramaniam, Geetha·2014·Substance Abuse

Abstract

Background: Integrated treatment for youth with substance use disorders (SUDs) and co-occurring psychiatric disorders is recommended; however, there are few studies that have evaluated integrated treatment approaches. Methods: This paper includes a brief review of cognitive-behavioral and family therapies, since they have been demonstrated to be effective treatments for the disorders that commonly co-occur with substance use. It also describes how an integrated treatment paradigm has been implemented using one Empirically Supported Treatment, the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (A-CRA). Results: There is existing research that supports the use of several A-CRA procedures to treat substance use and commonly co-occurring psychiatric disorders. Conclusions: In the absence of further research, it is reasonable in the interim to train clinicians in treatments that incorporate components that have been found to be effective for both substance use and commonly co-occurring psychiatric disorders. These treatments can then be adapted as needed based on an individual youth's set of problems. Further research is needed to test treatments for various combinations of SUDs and psychiatric disorders (i.e., depression, trauma-related problems, conduct disorder/behavior problems, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD]).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08897077.2014.936993

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Godley, S. H., Smith, J. E., Passetti, L. L., & Subramaniam, G.
Affiliations
  • Chestnut Health Systems (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
Corresponding author
Godley, Susan H.
Venue
Substance Abuse
Published
2014-10
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
352-363
ISSN
  • 0889-7077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-0164
OpenAlex
W2070657799
Cited by
42
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Substance Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (27007-0191)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach, adolescent substance use disorders, co-occurring psychiatric disorders, integrated treatment, empirically supported treatments, cognitive behavioral therapy, family therapy, treatment adaptation, depression, conduct disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Mental Disorders, Family Therapy, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review