Cited by 244Counseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCrime Patterns and Interventions

The Effects of Family Therapies for Adolescent Delinquency and Substance Abuse: A Meta‐analysis

Baldwin, Scott A., Christian, Sarah, Berkeljon, Arjan, Shadish, William R.·2012·Journal of Marital and Family Therapy

Abstract

This meta-analysis summarizes results from k = 24 studies comparing either Brief Strategic Family Therapy, Functional Family Therapy, Multidimensional Family Therapy, or Multisystemic Therapy to either treatment-as-usual, an alternative therapy, or a control group in the treatment of adolescent substance abuse and delinquency. Additionally, the authors reviewed and applied three advanced meta-analysis methods including influence analysis, multivariate meta-analysis, and publication bias analyses. The results suggested that as a group the four family therapies had statistically significant, but modest effects as compared to treatment-as-usual (d = 0.21; k = 11) and as compared to alternative therapies (d = 0.26; k = 11). The effect of family therapy compared to control was larger (d = 0.70; k = 4) but was not statistically significant probably because of low power. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether the various models differed in their effectiveness relative to each other. Influence analyses suggested that three studies had a large effect on aggregate effect sizes and heterogeneity statistics. Moderator and multivariate analyses were largely underpowered but will be useful as this literature grows.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00248.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Family-based treatments supported by evidence have been shown to outperform treatments delivered to individuals or groups.

    “The utilization of evidence-based family approaches has demonstrated superiority over individual or group-based treatments (Baldwin, Christian, Berkeljon, & Shandish, 2012).”

    From The impact of substance use disorders on families and children: from theory to practice (2013) · cites this paper as Baldwin, Christian, Berkeljon, & Shandish, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baldwin, S. A., Christian, S., Berkeljon, A., & Shadish, W. R.
Affiliations
  • Brigham Young University (US)
  • University of California System (US)
Corresponding author
Baldwin, Scott A.
Venue
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-06
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
281-304
ISSN
  • 0194-472X (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0606
OpenAlex
W2166359241
Cited by
244
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Marital and Family Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
family therapy, juvenile delinquency, adolescent substance abuse, brief strategic family therapy, functional family therapy, multidimensional family therapy, multisystemic therapy, treatment effectiveness, influence analysis, publication bias
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Combined Modality Therapy, Family Therapy, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, Psychotherapy, Group, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Adolescent Health Services, Evidence-Based Medicine, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review