Cited by 24Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsHormonal and reproductive studies

Insulin resistance and body composition in Turner syndrome: effect of sequential change in the route of estrogen administration

de Figueiredo Alves, Solange Travassos, Gallichio, Carla Tavares, Guimarães, Marília Martins·2006·Gynecological Endocrinology

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine the impact of sequential change in the route of estrogen administration on body composition and insulin resistance in patients with Turner syndrome (TS) using cyclical hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). We carried out a self-controlled study of nine non-obese patients with TS, with an average age of 23 +/- 4.9 years. Body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), fasting glycemia, insulin tolerance (glucose disappearance constant during an insulin tolerance test, kITT) and body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) were studied after 1 year's use of CEE plus MPA and repeated after 1 year's use of 17beta-estradiol gel with the same schedule of MPA administration. We did not observe any difference between the oral and percutaneous HRT with regard to BMI, WHR and insulin tolerance (kITT: 4.9 +/- 1.5 vs. 5.3 +/- 1.5%/min, p = 0.8). During administration of the 17beta-estradiol gel a tendency to increased total lean mass (p = 0.054) was observed. We conclude that sequential change in the route of estrogen administration in TS patients using cyclical HRT with CEE and MPA does not affect insulin resistance, although use of percutaneous 17beta-estradiol gel seems to exert favorable changes in body composition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08916930600929586

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Figueiredo Alves, S. T., Gallichio, C. T., & Guimarães, M. M.
Venue
Gynecological Endocrinology
Published
2006-01
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
590-594
ISSN
  • 0951-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0766
OpenAlex
W2079211291
Cited by
24
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gynecological Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
Keywords
Turner syndrome, insulin resistance, body composition, conjugated equine estrogens, medroxyprogesterone acetate, hormone replacement therapy, insulin tolerance test, lean body mass, waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Body Composition, Drug Administration Routes, Estrogens, Conjugated (USP), Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Turner Syndrome, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Body Mass Index, Body Fat Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review