Cited by 505Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementPublic Policy and Administration ResearchEvaluation and Performance Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating Collaborative Natural ResourceManagement

CONLEY, ALEXANDER, MOOTE, MARGARET A.·2003·Society & Natural Resources

DOI 10.1080/08941920309181

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this article, we look at the evolving collaborative natural resource management movement in the United States and discuss current calls to evaluate it. We then explore approaches researchers have used to evaluate both specific efforts and the broader movement. Evaluative criteria developed thus far by several researchers show commonalities as well as differences. We argue that evaluation approaches will necessarily vary with the evaluation's intent, the type of collaborative effort being evaluated, and the values of the evaluator. Evaluators need to consider and make explicit their standards for comparison, criteria, and methods in order to clarify the nature of an evaluation and facilitate the synthesis of findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08941920309181

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources
Elinor Ostrom, B., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.9739 · Cited by 3,869
Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems
Kramer, R., & Gray, B. (1990) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258026 · Cited by 2,683
Whose Reality Counts?: Putting the First Last
Chambers, R. (1997) · Cited by 2,379
Utilization-Focused Evaluation
(2018) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781506326139.n729 · Cited by 2,315
Making collaboration work : lessons from innovation in natural resource management
Roush, D. (2002) · Electronic Green Journal · doi:10.5070/g311610473 · Cited by 1,438
Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems
Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944369908976071 · Cited by 1,306
Community Natural Resource Management: Promise, Rhetoric, and Reality
Kellert, J. N. M. S. R. (2000) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/089419200750035575 · Cited by 758
The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement
Susskind, L. E., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (1999) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452231389 · Cited by 730
Representing communities: Histories and politics of community‐based natural resource management
Brosius, J. P., Tsing, A., & Zerner, C. (1998) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941929809381069 · Cited by 578
Planning Through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal
Innes, J. E. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781351179522-13 · Cited by 571

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 505

Multi-scale Analysis of Collaborative National Forest Planning Contexts in the Rural US Mountain West
Crawford, T. W., & Wilson, R. K. (2005) · Population and Environment · doi:10.1007/s11111-005-0003-0 · Cited by 8
Enabling multi-faceted measures of success for protected area management in Trinidad and Tobago
Granderson, A. A. (2011) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.02.010 · Cited by 8
“The various stakeholders bring different assets and values to the process but one or a few parties need to take leadership and have ultimate authority (Conley & Moote, 2003; Cousins & Whitmore, 1998; Parkinson, 2009).”
Background
Organizational Change in the US Forest Service: Negotiating Organizational Boundaries in the Collaborative Process
Orth, P. B., & Cheng, A. S. (2019) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-019-01145-y · Cited by 8
Learning About the Social Elements of Adaptive Management in the South Island Tussock Grasslands of New Zealand
Allen, W. J., & Jacobson, C. L. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9632-7_6 · Cited by 8
Can gamification save the planet? Revolutionizing citizen science for biodiversity conservation
Sajan, K. C., & Sapkota, A. (2025) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111001 · Cited by 10
On Collaborative Governance: Building Consensus on Priorities to Manage Invasive Species Through Collective Action
Lynch, S. C. (2025) · Plant-Environment Interactions · doi:10.1002/pei3.70029 · Cited by 7
“However, the direct link between collaboration dynamics and collaborative actions is difficult to document empirically because key actions take place over time while under the influence of an evolving system context (Conley and Moote 2003; Koontz and Thomas 2006).”
Developing reliable and valid measures for evaluating collaborative governance and adaptability: An example from the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program
Beeton, T. A., Teel, T. L., Colavito, M. M., vonHedemann, N., Huayhuaca, C., Cheng, A. S., Ghasemi, B., & Snitker, A. J. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122664 · Cited by 14
A Study of Governance Arrangements for Land Use and Natural Resource Management Planning in Cape York Peninsula
Potts, R., Vella, K. J., Dale, A. P., & Sipe, N. (2015) · Australian Geographer · doi:10.1080/00049182.2015.1048594 · Cited by 7
“A number of frameworks exist to analyse individual plans, policies and institutional dynamics (Patton 1982; Conley & Moote 2003; McDavid & Hawthorn 2006; Owen 2006; Hsu & Sandford 2007; Hoggarth & Comfort 2010).”
Background
Collaboration as process: a case study of Michigan's watershed permit
Rinkus, M. A., Dobson, T. A., Gore, M. L., & Dreelin, E. A. (2015) · Water Policy · doi:10.2166/wp.2015.202 · Cited by 7
Creating public value through collaborative environmental governance
Müller, K. (2010) · SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) · Cited by 7
Assessing Community-based Natural Resources Management at Lake Naivasha, Kenya
Isyaku, U., Chindo, M. I., & Ibrahim, M. (2011) · Environment and Natural Resources Research · doi:10.5539/enrr.v1n1p106 · Cited by 7
Linking Law and N ew G overnance: Examining Gaps, Hybrids, and Integration in Water Policy
Holley, C. (2015) · Law & Policy · doi:10.1111/lapo.12048 · Cited by 7
Collaboration and Conflict in the Adirondack Park: An Analysis of Conservation Discourses Over Time
O’Donnell, J. M., & Stokowski, P. A. (2016) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2016.1150537 · Cited by 7
What’s in a name? The search for ‘common ground’ in Kenora, Northwestern Ontario
Robson, J. P., Sinclair, A. J., Davidson‐Hunt, I. J., & Diduck, A. P. (2013) · Journal of Deliberative Democracy · doi:10.16997/jdd.169 · Cited by 7
“Central to such developments are transparency and accountability (Pinkerton and Weinstein 1995; Conley and Moote 2003; Dietz and Stern 2009), of which active communication plays a key role (Kooiman 2003).”
Background
Local impacts of federal forest policy changes on Canadian model forests: An institutional capacity perspective
Bullock, R. C. L., & Reed, M. G. (2019) · Environmental Policy and Governance · doi:10.1002/eet.1873 · Cited by 7
Towards a more adaptive co - management of natural resources – increasing social - ecological resilience in southeast Madagascar
Holloway, G. J., & Short, S. (2014) · Madagascar Conservation & Development · doi:10.4314/mcd.v9i1.7 · Cited by 8
“These included collaborative management (Conley and Moote 2003, Plummer and Fitzgibbon 2004), adaptive management (Plummer 2009) and ecosystems management (Grumbine 1994).”
Background
Management of urban stormwater : advancing program design and evaluation
Morison, P. (2017) · Figshare · doi:10.4225/03/5927e0ba6eacc · Cited by 7
Community forests for forest communities : an examination of power imbalances, challenges and goals in Brazil and Mexico
Hajjar, R. (2011) · cIRcle (University of British Columbia) · doi:10.14288/1.0071699 · Cited by 7
“…and promoting community-based forest management, and offered rationalizations for this shift in governance (Agrawal and Gibson, 1999; Agrawal and Ribot, 1999; Bradshaw, 2003; Charnley and Poe, 2007; Conley and Moote, 2003; Kellert, et al., 2000; Larson, 2003; Larson and Soto, 2008; Ribot, 2004).”
BackgroundMethod
Saving the Salmon: Examining the Cost-Effectiveness of Collaboration in Oregon
Mehdi, Q., & Nabatchi, T. (2022) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muac037 · Cited by 6
Listening to Indigenous Voices, Interests, and Priorities That Would Inform Tribal Co-Management of Natural Resources on a California State University Forest
Erickson, Z. J., Boston, K., Dockry, M. J., & Berrill, J. (2022) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f13122165 · Cited by 6
Formative evaluation for improving collaborative planning: A case study at the regional scale
Cameron, J., Grant‐Smith, D., & Johnson, A. (2005) · Australian Planner · doi:10.1080/07293682.2005.9982446 · Cited by 7
Examining the benefits of collaboration: the Provider-User Matrix for collaborative flood risk management illustrated by the case of the Ljusnan River, Sweden
Hedelin, B., & Hjerpe, M. (2014) · Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research · doi:10.1080/19390459.2014.977539 · Cited by 6
“In most of the studies that concern the issue of benefits, by assessing success, success is defined by the group members themselves, and the focus is on whether the collaborative efforts meet their internally defined goals and objectives (Conley & Moote, 2003; Leach, 2002).”
Background
Common Influences on the Success of Habitat Conservation Planning under the Endangered Species Act
Rodgers, K., Willcox, A. S., & Willcox, E. V. (2017) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871209.2017.1344895 · Cited by 7
“…perceptions “outside the box” of predetermined survey questions, and is appropriate for examining stakeholder attitudes and perceptions about important process outcomes such as shared learning, development of trust, and conflict resolution (Conley & Moote, 2003; Deruiter, 2002; Prokopy, 2011).”
Background
Managing the Science-Policy Interface in a Complex and Contentious World
Beratan, K. K., & Karl, H. A. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2549-2_10 · Cited by 7
Co-investments in land management: lessons from the Galessa watershed in Ethiopia
Adimassu, Z., Kessler, A., & Stroosnijder, L. (2013) · International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology · doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.840340 · Cited by 6
“Moreover, the success of these co-investment initiatives should be supported by evaluating practical examples (Conley & Moote 2003; Koontz & Thomas 2006; Campbell et al. 2011).”
Background
Adaptive Governance for Resilience of Peri-Urban Socioecological Systems
Lima, P. T., Pinel, S. L., & Conway-Gómez, K. (2018) · Resilient cities · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76944-8_4 · Cited by 6
An Approach to Analysing Scale‐Sensitivity and Scale‐Effectiveness of Governance in Biodiversity Conservation
Primmer, E., Paloniemi, R., Mathevet, R., Apostolopoulou, E., Tzanopoulos, J., Ring, I., Kettunen, M., Similä, J., Tusznio, J., Grodzińska‐Jurczak, M., et al. (2014) · doi:10.1002/9781118567135.ch15 · Cited by 6
A Critical Frame Analysis of Northern Ontario's 'Forestry Crisis'
Bullock, R. C. L. (2010) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo) · Cited by 6
Tracking progress : the monitoring process used in collaborative forest landscape restoration projects in the Pacific Northwest
DeMeo, T. E., Markus, A., Bormann, B. T., & Leingang, J. (2015) · Scholars' Bank (University of Oregon) · Cited by 6
Collaborative Environmental Governance and Indigenous Governance: A Synthesis
von der Porten, S. (2013) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo) · Cited by 6
A Critical Analysis of Communicative Planning Theory as a Theoretical Underpinning for Integrated Resource and Environmental Management
Murray, D. J. (2007) · Griffith Research Online · doi:10.25904/1912/2249 · Cited by 6
Collaborative governance in marine and coastal management: A systematic review
Asio, M. V. S., Cvitanovic, C., Lau, J. D., & Diedrich, A. (2025) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.108020 · Cited by 16
Unpacking the Taxonomy of Wildland Fire Collaboratives in the United States West: Impact of Response Diversity on Social-Ecological Resilience
Srinivasan, J., Jones, K., & Morgan, M. (2025) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-025-02170-w · Cited by 5
“Some common criteria of collaboratives include shared vision and clear goals, and environmental outcome criteria, including improved habitat, land protected from development, and land management practices (Conley and Moote 2003).”
Shifting power dynamics and decision-making on U.S. National Forests: Oregon forest collaboratives in the era of social forestry
Kornhauser, K., & Hajjar, R. (2024) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103291 · Cited by 5
The Emergence of Watershed and Forest Collaboratives
Flitcroft, R. L., Cerveny, L. K., Bormann, B. T., Smith, J. E., Asah, S. T., & Fischer, A. P. (2017) · Island Press/Center for Resource Economics eBooks · doi:10.5822/978-1-61091-768-1_9 · Cited by 5
Managing Forest Health through Collaboration on the Allegheny High Unglaciated Plateau
Hanson, J. W., Hille, A. T., Stout, S. L., McDonough, M. H., & Oldland, W. K. (2020) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.1093/jofore/fvaa010 · Cited by 5
“Social benefits include reduced conflict because of improved dialogue, development of new relations, and improved levels of trust (Conley and Moote 2003, Mandarano 2008).”
Residents’ knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for non-point source pollution control: a study of Nansihu Lake Watershed, China
Hao, J. (2008) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · Cited by 5
Who litigates and who collaborates? Evidence from environmental groups influencing National Forest management
Burke, C. A. (2013) · Interest Groups & Advocacy · doi:10.1057/iga.2013.1 · Cited by 5
Co-management of Forests and Forest Land Under Decentralization Process in Central Vietnam
Tu, T. N., Burgers, P., & Zoomers, A. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7957-0_23 · Cited by 5
Developing conservation governance strategies: holistic management of protected areas in Nepal
Budhathoki, P. (2012) · Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) · Cited by 5
Ecosystem-Based Management
Matso, K. E. (2015) · Encyclopedia of earth sciences series/Encyclopedia of earth sciences · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8801-4_41 · Cited by 5
Sustainable Development and the Water Energy Nexus
Nasr, G. J. (2013) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b14591-5 · Cited by 4
Criteria for the Assessment of Planning Processes for Sustainable River Basin Management — Illustration by two cases: the EU Water Framework Directive and ongoing water planning processes in Sweden
Hedelin, B. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75941-6_21 · Cited by 4
Developing a dynamic framework to examine the interplay between environmental stress, stakeholder participation processes and hydrological systems
Carr, G., Blöschl, G., & Loucks, D. P. (2014) · Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences · doi:10.5194/piahs-364-326-2014 · Cited by 4
“Intermediary outcomes do not relate to a direct change in resource management at the point in time at which they are evaluated, but evidence suggests they may be essential to achieve resource management improvements (Conley and Moote 2003, Connick and Innes 2003, Genskow 2009).”
Background
Collaboration Adrift: Factors for Anchoring into Governance Systems, Distilled from a Study of Three Regulated Rivers
Hedelin, B., Alkan-Olsson, J., & GREENBERG, L. A. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15064980 · Cited by 4
Organisational Culture as a Function of Adaptability and Responsiveness in Public Service Agencies
Nyambe, N., BREEN, C. M., & Fincham, R. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-46266-8_10 · Cited by 4
MOVING FORWARD, KEEPING THE PAST IN FRONT OF US Treaty settlements, conservation, co-governance and communication
Dodson, G. (2014) · Cited by 4
The feasibility of national parks in South Africa endorsing a community development agenda: The case of Mokala National Park and two neighbouring rural communities
Coetzee, H. C., & Nell, W. (2019) · Koedoe · doi:10.4102/koedoe.v61i1.1470 · Cited by 4
EVALUACIÓN PARTICIPATIVA PARA LA GOBERNANZA ADAPTATIVA DE SISTEMAS SOCIO-ECOLÓGICOS: Participatory Evaluation for Adaptative Governance of Social-Ecologic Systems
Trimble, M., & Plummer, R. (2019) · Tekoporá Revista Latinoamericana de humanidades ambientales y estudios territoriales · doi:10.36225/tek.1.1.5 · Cited by 5
Review: The conservation of Tengger indigenous people's traditional knowledge of biological natural resource‐based disease treatments
Kuspraningrum, E., Luth, T., Yuliati, Y., Safa’at, R., & Kuspradini, H. (2020) · Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity · doi:10.13057/biodiv/d211108 · Cited by 4
“…because natural resources are a source of income, as well as the main capital (Saleng 2013, Rinaldi 2015; Kuspraningrum et al. 2020) to be preserved (ii) through research collaboration (Conley and Moote 2003; Ushie 2013; Thomas et al. 2016; Packer et al. 2019) between the indigenes and researchers.”
Background
PENGELOLAAN MINERBA DALAM PERSEPEKTIF GOOD GOVERNANCE (TINJAUAN TEORITIK)
Rahimallah, M. T. A., Pratiwi, A. D., & Kusmin, A. F. (2021) · Jurnal Arajang · doi:10.31605/arajang.v4i1.2105 · Cited by 4
“Kriteria-kriteria evaluasi yang sering dipakai meliputi: kriteria proses, kriteria dampak lingkungan, dan kriteria dampak sosial-ekonomi (Conley & Moote, 2003).”
Background
From governance rhetoric to practical reality: Making community-based natural resource management decision-making work
Pero, L. V. (2005) · Cited by 4
Other Voices from the Neighborhood: Reconsidering Success in Community Forestry—A Response to Bradshaw's Commentary Paper: On Definitions of “Success” and Contingencies Affecting Success in Community Forestry
Reed, M. G., & McIlveen, K. (2007) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920701429304 · Cited by 4
Legitimacy and the Use of Natural Resources in Kruger National Park, South Africa
Tanner, R. J., Freimund, W. A., & van Wyk, E. (2010) · International Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2753/ijs0020-7659400304 · Cited by 5
Evaluating Capacity Building Methods to Strengthen Livestock Extension Outcomes in Laos
Photakoun, V., & Millar, J. (2009) · Cited by 4
Overcoming the challenges of "doing participation" in environment and development: Workshop summary of lessons learned and ways forward
Forrester, J. M., & Swartling, Å. G. (2010) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.10077.15843 · Cited by 4
Local institutions and Natural Resource ManagementPreprint
Snell, M., Bell, K. P., & Leahy, J. E. (2010) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.61880 · Cited by 4
“Perceived success can serve as an indicator of some types of success, especially social success, where data are lacking (Lubell et al. 2002, Ferreyra and Beard 2007, Leach et al. 2002, Conley and Moote 2003).”
BackgroundInfluential
Planning for Sustainable Use of Water
Hedelin, B. (2008) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 4
A Gendered Perspective of Learning and Representation in Forest Management Advisory Committees in Canada
Richardson, K. (2008) · Mspace (University of Manitoba) · Cited by 4
Evolving co-management practice: Developing a community-based environmental monitoring framework with Tl'azt'en nation on the John Prince Research Forest.
Yim, D. (2010) · doi:10.24124/2010/bpgub659 · Cited by 4
Understanding Community Capacity for Bottom-up Management of Mount Hakusan UNESCO Biosphere Reserve
Mammadova, A., Harada, S., Azhar, T., & Phisbien, R. M. (2024) · European Journal of Sustainable Development · doi:10.14207/ejsd.2024.v13n1p1 · Cited by 3
“The inadequacies of conventional "top-down" techniques have led to a greater emphasis on formalizing "bottom-up" community involvement in environmental management projects [Conley and Moote, 2003].”
Background
Guiding Multifunctional Landscape Changes Through Collaboration: Experiences from a Danish Case Study
Kristensen, L. S., Pears, D. Q., & Primdahl, J. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05263-7_9 · Cited by 3
Sustaining Civic Recreation: Understanding What Shapes Climbers’ Contributions to Local Resource Stewardship and Advocacy
Carter, D. (2023) · Journal of Outdoor Recreation Education and Leadership · doi:10.18666/jorel-2023-11642 · Cited by 3
“Community Forests” in the United States – How Do we Know One When we See One?
Frey, G. E., Hajjar, R., Charnley, S., McGinley, K., Schelhas, J., Tarr, N. M., McCaskill, L., & Cubbage, F. W. (2024) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2024.2361413 · Cited by 3
“Some authors use collaborative forest management and CBFM interchange-ably (Conley and Moote 2003), and the two movements have similar emphases and approaches.”
Applying Dynamic Performance Management to Foster Collaborative Governance in Higher Education: A Conceptual Framework
Zhang, Z., Bivona, E., Qi, J., & Yan, H. (2020) · System dynamics for performance management · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42970-6_15 · Cited by 3
Module 10: Designing Participatory Decision Strategies
Rauschmayer, F. (2013) · Environmental science and engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-34789-7_20 · Cited by 3
Conclusion: From describing to prescribing--transitioning to place-based conservation [Chapter 18]
Stewart, W. P., Williams, D. R., & Kruger, L. E. (2013) · Springer eBooks · Cited by 3
Giving and Reciprocity in Natural Resource Management and Consensus Building: An Application of Economic Anthropology to Understanding the Clearwater Basin Forest Collaborative
Pinel, S. L. (2013) · Human Organization · doi:10.17730/humo.72.2.7k044l1146224291 · Cited by 3
Contextual Awareness in Long-Term Partnerships Builds Adaptive Capacity for Conservation
Painter, M., & Kretser, H. E. (2012) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871209.2012.710711 · Cited by 3
“Collaborative natural resource management involves multiparty programs or decisionmaking processes using participatory approaches, including partnerships with local organizations (Conley & Moote, 2003).”
Background
Finding the Political ‘Sweet Spot’: Sectional Interests, Consensus Power, and the Everglades Restudy (1992–2000)
Dengler, M. (2007) · Environment and Planning A Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a3965 · Cited by 3
“It has been defined as `̀ multi-party natural resource management projects, programs, or decision-making processes using a participatory approach'' (Conley and Moote, 2003, page 372).”
Background
Policy advice for public participation in British Columbia forest management
DesRoches, C. T. (2007) · The Forestry Chronicle · doi:10.5558/tfc83672-5 · Cited by 3
Evaluating BC's Community Forest Agreement program as a tool for source water protection
Rethoret, L. (2010) · Summit (Simon Fraser University) · Cited by 3
El paisaje en animación suspendida y su valoración como dinamizador del desarrollo rural de la comuna de Maullín, Chile
Araya-Schübelin, X. G., & Ojeda, C. (2016) · Revista de geografía Norte Grande · doi:10.4067/s0718-34022016000300011 · Cited by 3
Stakeholder Involvement: An Identified Invaluable Resource in the Management and Conservation of Ireland’s Natural Religious Heritage Croagh Patrick: Insights and Challenges
Enongene, V., & Griffin, K. (2018) · Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin) · doi:10.6092/issn.2036-5195/7728 · Cited by 3
“Nonetheless, these collaborative approaches have attracted vocal criticism (Blumberg and Knuffke, 1998; Coggins, 1998; Conley & Moote, 1999; McClosky, 1998; and Southern Utah Wilderness Association, 1994 (as cited in Conley & Moote, 2003).”
Stakeholder Analysis in the Context of Natural Disaster Mitigation: The Case of Flooding in Three U.S. Cities
Ter-Mkrtchyan, A. V., & Franklin, A. L. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su152014945 · Cited by 3
“However, evidence from natural hazard mitigation research shows that collaborative activities often face various challenges, especially when identifying resource allocation and decision-making strategies [2].”
Background
Common property protected areas
Kitamura, K. (2010) · Summit (Simon Fraser University) · Cited by 3
Burning through boundaries: collaborative governance and wildland fire planning in the United States and New South Wales, Australia.
Brummel, R. F. (2010) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 3
Public Participation: Rhetoric or Reality? An Analysis of Planning and Management in the Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve
Seaba, N. (2006) · Mspace (University of Manitoba) · Cited by 3
The contributions of social learning to collaborative forest governance in Canada and Uganda: Lessons from forest-based communities
Egunyu, F. (2015) · University Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan) · Cited by 3
Determinants of community participation in the implementation of development projects: A case of Garissa sewerage project
Hussein, A. A. (2013) · Cited by 3
Factors and processes affecting co-management of natural resources
Gilmour, P. W. (2013) · Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) · Cited by 3
The Tension between Technocratic and Social Values in Environmental Decision-making: An'Yang Stream Restoration in South Korea
Hong, C. (2000) · doi:10.15760/etd.3443 · Cited by 3
“…quality, water culture, historic preservation, regional economic development, ecological conservation, landscaping, political issues, etc.) (AHP, CA and AC) 63 In stream restoration, conflicts among the stakeholders occur when different frames attempt to work together (Conley and Moote, 2003).”
Background
The metagovernance of Australian water policy: Practices, rationales and outcomes
Eberhard, R. (2018) · Cited by 3
La gestion intégrée des ressources en eau à l'épreuve du bassin versant : cas du bassin du Tensift au Maroc
Tanouti, O. (2017) · doi:10.70675/d4d7c94bz5d2az468dzb83cz89d87fd7b63c · Cited by 3
Competence in Unsustainability Resolution—A New Paradigm
Dikou, A. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16188211 · Cited by 2
Compatibility, Effectiveness and Sustainability of Grass-Root Collaboration in Promoting Environmental and Natural Resource Conservation (An Evaluative Analysis)
Susilo, R. K. D. (2022) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/995/1/012067 · Cited by 2
“In relation to location, the research was conducted in Batu City recalling that the community-based environment conservation programs develop in this city, one of which is collaboration initiated by the authors consisting of university, NGO activist, and natural resource managing community.”
BackgroundInfluential
El reto de evaluar los Presupuestos Participativos: revisión de modelos y planteamiento de una propuesta sintética
Esteban-Carbonell, E., Romero-Martín, S., Río, E. M. T.-D., & Quintero, J. D. G. (2021) · Reforma y democracia. · doi:10.69733/clad.ryd.n80.a256 · Cited by 2
OREGON'S ACTS, CROSS-JURISDICTIONAL COLLABORATION AND IMPROVED TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Brody, S., & Margerum, R. D. (2009) · PDXScholar (Portland State University) · Cited by 2
What's Left? Canadian Biosphere Reserves as Sustainability-in-Practice
Reed, M. G., & Massie, M. M. M. (2013) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 2
Advancing Practical Theory in Environmental Communication: A Phronetic Analysis of Environmental Communication in New Zealand
Dodson, G., & Palliser, A. (2016) · Iowa State University Summer Symposium on Science Communication · doi:10.31274/sciencecommunication-180809-3 · Cited by 2
“Without considering the socio-political-legal which organises participation, these approaches run the risk of being seen as panacea to environmental management challenges (Conley and Moote, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluential
Navigating the Space between Policy and Practice: Toward a Typology of Collaborators in a Federal Land Management Agency
Burkardt, N., & Thomas, R. E. W. (2022) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2022.2109086 · Cited by 2
“In the context of conservation, parties must balance social or relational outcomes and priorities (Conley and Moote 2003) while also considering environmental conditions (Kenney 1999).”
Background
Collaborative natural resource management in a changing institutional landscape : rhetoric and practice of catchment management in New South Wales, Australia
Fidelman, P. I. J. (2006) · Research Online (University of Wollongong) · Cited by 2
Participatory watershed management to decrease land degradation and sediment transport in Kagera and Nyando catchments of Lake Victoria basin
Kenge, J. G. (2009) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 2
COLLABORATION BETWEEN RESEARCHERS AND BIOSPHERE RESERVE PRACTITIONERS: A CASE STUDY OF REDBERRY LAKE BIOSPHERE RESERVE, CANADA
Zbyranyk, O. (2012) · University Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan) · Cited by 2
EXPLORING WATER GOVERNANCE IN NORTHERN SASKATCHEWAN: OPPORTUNITIES FOR A WATERSHED COUNCIL
Lemoine, N. R. (2012) · HARVEST (University of Saskatchewan) · Cited by 2
Building community with recycling: a case study of two small islands in British Columbia, Canada
Taylor, E. G. R. (2008) · UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · Cited by 2
Marine Spatial Planning from an Irish perspective: Towards Best Practice in Integrated Maritime Governance
Flannery, W. (2011) · ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) · doi:10.13025/16874 · Cited by 2
Managing commercial recreation on crown land in British Columbia : a policy evaluation
Curtis, N. (2003) · Summit (Simon Fraser University) · Cited by 2
Interconnections among community-based conservation, local knowledge and environmental education: Case studies from India
Shukla, S. (2007) · Mspace (University of Manitoba) · Cited by 2
A survey of Bureau of Land Management employees on collaboration and alternative dispute resolution
Ruell, E. W., Burkardt, N., & Donovan, R. M. (2015) · Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World · doi:10.3133/ofr20151015 · Cited by 2

Authors: CONLEY, A., & MOOTE, M. A.
Affiliations: Northern Arizona University (US)
Venue: Society & Natural Resources
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 2003-05
Volume: 16
Issue: 5
Pages: 371-386
ISSN: 0894-1920 (ISSN-L)
1521-0723
DOI: 10.1080/08941920309181
OpenAlex: W2157693829
Cited by: 505
References: 53
Citations by year: 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 23
FWCI: 13.46
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Society & Natural Resources (publishedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords: collaborative natural resource management, evaluation approaches, evaluation criteria, evaluation standards, collaborative governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Evaluating Collaborative Natural ResourceManagement

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks