Cited by 505Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementPublic Policy and Administration ResearchEvaluation and Performance Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating Collaborative Natural ResourceManagement

CONLEY, ALEXANDER, MOOTE, MARGARET A.·2003·Society & Natural Resources

DOI 10.1080/08941920309181

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this article, we look at the evolving collaborative natural resource management movement in the United States and discuss current calls to evaluate it. We then explore approaches researchers have used to evaluate both specific efforts and the broader movement. Evaluative criteria developed thus far by several researchers show commonalities as well as differences. We argue that evaluation approaches will necessarily vary with the evaluation's intent, the type of collaborative effort being evaluated, and the values of the evaluator. Evaluators need to consider and make explicit their standards for comparison, criteria, and methods in order to clarify the nature of an evaluation and facilitate the synthesis of findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08941920309181

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources
Elinor Ostrom, B., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.9739 · Cited by 3,869
Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems
Kramer, R., & Gray, B. (1990) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258026 · Cited by 2,683
Whose Reality Counts?: Putting the First Last
Chambers, R. (1997) · Cited by 2,379
Utilization-Focused Evaluation
(2018) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781506326139.n729 · Cited by 2,315
Making collaboration work : lessons from innovation in natural resource management
Roush, D. (2002) · Electronic Green Journal · doi:10.5070/g311610473 · Cited by 1,438
Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems
Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944369908976071 · Cited by 1,306
Community Natural Resource Management: Promise, Rhetoric, and Reality
Kellert, J. N. M. S. R. (2000) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/089419200750035575 · Cited by 758
The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement
Susskind, L. E., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (1999) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452231389 · Cited by 730
Representing communities: Histories and politics of community‐based natural resource management
Brosius, J. P., Tsing, A., & Zerner, C. (1998) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941929809381069 · Cited by 578
Planning Through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal
Innes, J. E. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781351179522-13 · Cited by 571

Show all 53 references

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 505

Exploring the potential of co-investments in land management in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia
Teferi, Z. A. (2013) · doi:10.18174/242733 · Cited by 2
Advancing Local Marine Protection, Cross Cultural Collaboration and Dialogue in Northland
Dodson, G. (2015) · doi:10.34074/rsrp.12015 · Cited by 2
“The promise that collaborations, particularly between traditional/indigenous owners and conventional conservation and environmental protection agencies or groups, can produce positive conservation and social outcomes remains powerful, but should be made to withstand critical re-examination (Agrawal and Gibson 1999; Co…”
Background
Mandated Collaboration as a Strategy of Environmental Governance? A Case Study of the Niagara Peninsula Source Protection Area in Ontario
Vaughan, K. S. (2012) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo) · Cited by 2
Great Lakes Remedial Action Plans (RAPs): Comparing the Hamilton Harbour and Toronto and Region RAPs as Governance Approaches
Martin, M. T. (2021) · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14647185.v1 · Cited by 2
Assessing Pandemic Impacts to Collaborative Management in Parks and Protected Areas
McCreary, A., Seekamp, E., & Edwards, M. B. (2025) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-025-02207-0 · Cited by 1
“While partnerships are widely viewed as a favorable approach to NRM, there are critics of collaborative arrangements who express concern about who is engaged in a partnership and the weight of their in ﬂ uence on public agency mission and goals (Conley and Moote 2003).”
Ego network properties as a way to reveal conflict in collaboration's clothing
Cutts, B. B., Muñoz‐Erickson, T. A., Darby, K. J., Neff, M. W., Larson, E. K., Bolin, B., & Wutich, A. (2010) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.486 · Cited by 1
Consensus Building in the Resolution of Complex Environmental Issues: A Case Study of the Hantan River Dam
Jaekyung, K., Kim, K., & Lee, M. (2009) · International Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/12294659.2009.10805133 · Cited by 1
“…of practices fall under the title of consensus building: collaborative planning (Innes and Booher 1999; Petts 2001; Frame, Gunton and Day 2004; Conley and Moote 2003); a new governance; alternative methods of dispute resolution such as facilitation, mediation, and other forms of assisted…”
Background
Views on Water Management from Students of Different Faculties at the University of Calgary: Developing Water Policies Using Focus Groups
Noga, J., & Wolbring, G. (2014) · Journal of Sustainable Development · doi:10.5539/jsd.v7n5p189 · Cited by 1
“Focus groups were conducted to collect qualitative information based on open-ended questions as perceptions are best understood through a participant’s own words (Conley & Moote, 2003).”
Method
Innovations and Challenges Related to Resource and Environmental Management
Mitchell, B. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9771-9_6 · Cited by 1
A Critical Evaluation of Public Participation in the Sudanese Planning Mandates
Bahreldin, I. Z. (2022) · University of Khartoum Engineering Journal · doi:10.53332/uofkej.v3i2.127 · Cited by 1
“However, Conley and Moote [14] explained three alternative approaches for evaluating collaborative planning practices, these are based upon; i. Comparing the outcomes of the collaborative decision-making process against its goals; ii.”
Habitat and the New YorkNew Jersey Harbor Estuary Program Evaluating Collaborative Environmental Planning Outputs and Outcomes: Restoring and Protecting
Mandarano, L. A. (2008) · Cited by 1
The Strategies for Creating Urban Village -Focusing on the Renaissance Case of Gamcheon Culture Village in Busan Metropolitan City-
김창수 (2012) · Korean Comparative Government Review · doi:10.18397/kcgr.2012.16.1.221 · Cited by 1
Les réserves de biosphère du Canada : apprentissage social et bonnes pratiques
Godmaire, H., Reed, M. G., & Guertin, M.-A. (2014) · Éducation relative à l environnement · doi:10.4000/ere.807 · Cited by 1
Approaching the Collaborative “Turn” in Water Governance: A Critical Reappraisal
Watson, N., & de Loë, R. C. (2021) · Sustainable development goals series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85839-1_4 · Cited by 1
A Tool for Assessing the Capacity of Local Watershed Partnerships to Produce Lasting Effects
Joice, J. P. (2010) · Cited by 1
THE ROLE OF SOCIO-ECONOMICINDICATORS IN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
Gurewitz, H. (2009) · Cited by 1
Cooperative Research Centre for Coastal Zone, Estuary & Waterway Management
Lockie, S., & Rockloff, S. F. (2005) · Cited by 1
Synthesis, part of a Special Feature on Transitions, Resilience and Governance: Linking Technological, Ecological and Political Systems The Politics of Reflexive Governance: Challenges for Designing Adaptive Management and Transition Management
Bornemann, B. (2011) · Cited by 1
La contribución de los modelos de gestión participativos en el desarrollo de los gobiernos municipales
Romero, X. (2015) · ECA Sinergia · doi:10.33936/eca_sinergia.v6i2.344 · Cited by 1
Stakeholder Participation in Marine Spatial Plan Making Process in Lampung Province
Asirin, Asbi, A. M., & Pakpahan, V. H. (2018) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/158/1/012030 · Cited by 1
Inter-Group Perceptions of Key Performance Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluating Scenic Viewpoints
Witkowski, S., Plummer, R., & Dale, G. (2022) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2022.2065393 · Cited by 1
“The question of how to appropriately incorporate stakeholder perceptions into management decisions is contested (Bennett 2016; Conley and Moote 2003; Estrella et al. 2000).”
Background
Characteristics of the Digital Marketing using IBM SPSS Statistics
Asifulla, A. (2023) · REST Journal on Banking Accounting and Business · doi:10.46632/jbab/2/2/6 · Cited by 1
Exploring Collaborative Governance: Case Studies of Disruptions in Coastal Zone Management Collaborations and Resulting Effects upon the Collaborations and Outcomes
Zator, R. (2011) · ScholarWorks - WMU (Western Michigan University) · Cited by 1
Adaptive governance for fire management planning : a case study on Prince Albert National Park, Saskatchewan
Almstedt, Å. (2010) · University Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan) · Cited by 1
Power in Collaborative Networks
Joosse, A. P. (2015) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 1
An Integrated Framework: Applying Attitude Theory to Environmental Concern & Public Support for Environmental Policy
Routhe, A. S. (2003) · Cited by 1
Natural resource management knows no bounds: A case study of the Cache River Joint Venture Partnership
Behnken, J. A. (2013) · OpenSIUC (Southern Illinois University Carbondale) · Cited by 1
Capacity to support cumulative effects assessment and management in the Athabasca watershed, Alberta, Canada
Skwaruk, J. S. (2011) · University Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan) · Cited by 1
Description of three environmental co-management systems in the Western Cape
Page, R. R. (2012) · SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) · Cited by 1
TOWARDS ECOSYSTEM-BASED MANAGEMENT IN CANADA'S NORTHEAST PACIFIC OCEAN: RESEARCH SUPPORT FOR AN EMERGING COLLABORATIVE SCIENCE INITIATIVE
Patterson, M. (2006) · Cited by 1
Faculty of Technology and Science Environmental and Energy Systems
Hagelqvist, A. (2009) · Cited by 1
Stakeholder Beliefs, Collaboration, and Policy Outcomes: An Analysis of Colorado’s Basin Roundtable Process
Koebele, E. A. (2014) · CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder) · Cited by 1
European Governance of Natural Resources: Participation in a Multi-Level Context
Rauschmayer, F., Paavola, J., & Wittmer, H. (2009) · Cited by 1
A case study on the use of focus groups as participatory research
Biello, T. (2009) · doi:10.32469/10355/6562 · Cited by 1
Challenges and Opportunities Facing Local Governance Agents in Advancing an Ecosystem Approach to Conceptualizing and Governing Community Health in Norfolk County, Ontario
Edge, S. (2007) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo) · Cited by 1
Making collaboration work: an evaluation of marine protected area planning processes on Canada’s Pacific Coast
Akins, P. (2017) · UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · Cited by 1
Social Capital Structure and Dynamics in Stream Restoration: A Social Network Analysis Approach to the Upper Shavers Fork, West Virginia
Kinder, P. (2017) · doi:10.33915/etd.7101 · Cited by 1
Evaluating community incentives for biodiversity conservation in protected areas in Nepal.
Spiteri, A. (2007) · doi:10.24124/2007/bpgub445 · Cited by 1
Need for a Contextualist IAD frameworkPreprint
Prateek, G., & Kelman, C. C. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3181844 · Cited by 1
Udzial spoleczenstwa szansa dla realizacji programu Natura 2000 w Polsce
Grodzińska‐Jurczak, M., & Cent, J. (2010) · Chrońmy Przyrodę Ojczystą
Collaborative Wildland Fire Restoration: Innovative Approaches in Arizona's Sky Islands
Raymondi, A. M. (2012) · Arizona State University Library Digital Repository (Arizona State University)
When ripples becomes waves : exploring the role of policy in the creation and coordination of citizen participation in Minnesota‟s water governance landscape.
Steiger-Meister, K. (2010) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota)
COLLABORATIVE EQUITABLE SOLUTION BUILDING FOR COMPLEX RURAL SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES: A Case Study of the South Deschutes County Regional Problem Solving Project
Nabeta, M. (2013) · Scholars' Bank (University of Oregon)
The efficacy of environmental impact assessment in Saskatchewan's forest resource sector
Rushton, R. J. (2012) · University Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan)
Efficacy of Strategic Environmental Assessment in Canada
Acharibasam, J. B. (2013) · University Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan)
A tale of two committees : evaluating collaborative management planning in Canada's Pacific groundfish fisheries
Davis, N. A. (2008) · cIRcle (University of British Columbia) · doi:10.14288/1.0066318
“…2004), exploring methodological choices (Chess 2000), and reviewing the approaches and findings of evaluation case studies (Rowe & Frewer 2004), 20 a detailed review of the different evaluation frameworks and what they are measuring remains largely unaddressed (though see Conley & Moote 2003).”
Background
Costs of participatory monitoring and evaluation of joint management of protected areas in the Northern Territory, Australia
Izurieta, A., Petheram, L., Stacey, N., & Garnett, S. T. (2012) · Australasian Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1080/14486563.2012.726130
“The benefits of M&E are widely recognised (Selin et al. 2000; Conley & Moote 2003), with good protected area management often linked to well-designed M&E processes (Stem et al. 2005; Hockings et al. 2006).”
Background
Community management, self-interest and environmental preservation in the Amazon
Thompson, B., & Osgood, D. T. (2011) · Interdisciplinary Environmental Review · doi:10.1504/ier.2011.040244
“Support for this approach arises due to the thought that land stewardship will result in more sustainable practice, and the benefits from use of the land will be more equitably distributed among local people (Conley and Moote, 2003; DeCaro and Stokes, 2008).”
Background
The C hallenges and Opportunities Thr oughout the Life Cycle of Landscape-Scale Collaborative Conservation Organizations: Case Studies in the Southern Appalachians and the Northern Rockies Ecosystems
Thomsen, J. M. (2014) · TigerPrints (Clemson University)
Stakeholder Participation in Watershed Management: An Evaluation of the Jordan Lake Stakeholder Project
Wyman, C. G., Maguire, L. A., & Steelman, T. A. (2008) · OpenSIUC (Southern Illinois University Carbondale)
An analysis of public participation under 2005 national forest planning regulations
Beres, A. S. (2007) · DukeSpace (Duke University)
QUANTIFYING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC MEETINGS TO GENERATE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
Kingsley, J. P. (2008)
The brave new world of forestry: designing a participatory strategy for successful community-based collaboration in Packwood, Washington
Lenentine, M. M. (2009) · Summit (Simon Fraser University)
COMPLEXITY IN NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: A CASE STUDY ON WILDERNESS DESIGNATION UNDER THE 2009 OMNIBUS PUBLIC LAND MANAGEMENT ACT IN OREGON
Fertig, A. (2010)
EVALUATING AGENCY PERCEPTIONS OF PARTNERSHIPS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Bender, K. A. (2004)
Chapter 12. Creating Community Forests
Belsky, J. (2008)
Collaboration Derailed:The Politics of ‘‘Community-Based’ ’ ResourceManagement in
Walker, P. A., & Hurley, P. T. (2003)
Conservation Democracy: Ecology, Public Participation, & United States National Forest Management under the Healthy Forest Initiative
George, A. L. (2010) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/qx0q-a945
Partnership evaluation for nature conservation projects in Hong Kong
Pei-lai, J. L. (2015) · doi:10.5353/th_b5610993
The Role of Science in Collaborative Forest Management
Colavito, M. M. (2015) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)
Meeting in the Middle: An evaluation of a novel approach to sharing information on soil health in the Murray Catchment. Report No. 42
Allan, C., & Wilson, B. (2008) · Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO)
Examining Processes or Outcomes? - Towards a Combination of Evaluation Concepts in European Environmental Governance
Rauschmayer, F., Berghöfer, A., Omann, I., & Zikos, D. (2008)
Local hazards knowledge and risk perceptions of stakeholders in Southern Illinois watershed partnerships
BouFajreldin, L. (2012) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Philanthropy through Park Partnerships
Vaughn, J., & Cortner, H. J. (2013) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137353894_1
Evaluating the Coquitlam River Watershed Roundtable Planning Process and the Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation Framework
Fielding, G. (2016) · Summit (Simon Fraser University)
An Interpretative Inquiry into Natural Resources and Environmental Leadership: Understanding the Nature of a Leadership Development Experience.
Addor, M. L. (2010) · NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries)
How the Contributions of Conveners Achieve Collaboration Goals
Gepraegs, R. M. (2008) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo)
Respecting Outcomes in Collaborative Processes: a low water response case study
Roth, A. P. (2014) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo)
DETERMINING SUCCESS IN WATERSHED RESTORATION USING INTERDISCIPLINARY METRICS: RIO SALADO ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROJECT, PHOENIX, ARIZONA
Schmidt, C. H. (2015) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)
Understanding Stakeholder Attitudes and Involvement in Habitat Conservation Plans and the Endangered Species Act
Rodgers, K. (2016)
A system for integrated environmental management in local authorities to inform departmental decision-making: the case of Hessequa Municipality
Carelse, S. L. (2016) · SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University)
Knowledge Production and Use in Collaborative Environmental Governance: a Case Study of Water Allocation Planning in South Australia
Taylor, B. C. (2011) · The Atrium (University of Guelph)
Perspectives of Sustainable Collaborative Management: A Case Study in Kerinci Seblat National Park, Sumatra-Indonesia
Yusri, D. (2017) · doi:10.53846/goediss-6274
A Qualitative Assessment of the Stakeholder Engagement Process: Development of the Falls Lake Nutrient Management Strategy Plan
Gallagher, M. A. (2017) · NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries)
SENSE OF PLACE AND LOCAL WATER MANAGEMENT: ASSESSING CURRENT PERCEPTIONS AND POTENTIAL FOR THE FUTURE IN OHIOPYLE, PENNSYLVANIA
Osborn, E. (2014)
IMPLEMENTASI DIALOG OTENTIK DALAM PENGELOLAAN HUTAN DI BKPH NGARENGAN KPH PATI PERUM PERHUTANI DIVISI REGIONAL JAWA TENGAH (Authentic Dialogue Implementation on Forest Management in BKPH Ngarengan KPH Pati Perum Perhutani Central Java Regional Division)
Pambudi, R., Maryudi, A., & Purwanto, R. H. (2018) · Jurnal Manusia dan Lingkungan · doi:10.22146/jml.23074
Standing closest to the flame: Community wildfire planning and the Healthy Forest Act
Fleeger, W. E. (2007) · University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)
Decentralisation and governance in land administration systems
Samsudin, S. B. (2014) · Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University)
Ecotourism as a means of encouraging ecological recovery in the Flinders Ranges, South Australia.
Moskwa, E. (2008) · Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)
An investigation into the causes and impacts of land degradation, and possible management strategies and mitigation measures in the Oshana region, Northern Namibia
Hamunyela, N. (2019) · SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University)
EXPLORING HOW GRADUATES OF THE NEBRASKA WATER LEADERS ACADEMY INFLUENCE COMMUNITY CAPITALS: TWO CASE STUDIES
Staggs, D. W. (2020) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska)
Exploring the Governance Outcomes of Social Learning through the Indigenous Circle of Experts (ICE) work with Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas (IPCAs)
Boardman, S. (2020) · DalSpace (Dalhousie University)
Interorganizational Collaboration in Implementing Urban Greening Policies in Saudi Arabia: An Institutional Collective Action Framework
Alkhurayyif, M. A. (2020) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · doi:10.12794/metadc1703320
Hydrogeological Survey for Interpretation of Damaging Process in Ancient Grave of Naqsh-e-Rostam, Iran
Ghobadi, A., Emami, M., & Aslani, H. (2014) · Journal of Geological Resource and Engineering · doi:10.17265/2328-2193/2014.03.006
Good Folks and Watershed Values: An Assessment of the Collaborative Approach to Watershed Management in Five Central Texas Watersheds
Beard, K. D. (2019)
The transformative capacity of watershed partnerships
Simms, G. (2008) · The Atrium (University of Guelph)
LONG-TERM DYNAMICS IN PLANT ABUNDANCE AND SPATIAL VARIATION IN RESPONSE TO GRAZING SYSTEMS, PRECIPITATION AND MESQUITE COVER
Mashiri, F. E. (2010) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)
Community participation in biodiversity conservation in Nepal.
Khadka, D. (2008) · doi:10.24124/2008/bpgub557
Marine conservation tourism and local communities : The case of Raja Ampat, Indonesia
Atmodjo, E. (2020) · doi:10.18174/532851
Great Lakes Remedial Action Plans (RAPs): Comparing the Hamilton Harbour and Toronto and Region RAPs as Governance Approaches
Martin, M. T. (2021) · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14647185
The Tension between Technocratic and Social Values in Environmental Decision-making: An'Yang Stream Restoration in South Korea
Hong, C. (2000) · doi:10.15760/etd.5668
Exploring Indigenous-led collaborative stewardship in a watershed context: Prespectives from the Nechako headwaters
Hewitt, K. (2019) · doi:10.24124/2019/59016
BUILDING FOOD INDEPENDENCE: IMPLEMENTATION CHRONICLES OF SUSTAINABLE FOOD HOUSE AREAS
Hutapea, Y. (2024) · Technium Books · doi:10.47577/book12126
Evaluación de Programas Públicos de Gobernanza Colaborativa: El Pacto por una Región Sostenible e Inclusiva, Chile
Zahn-Muñoz, C., & Mercado, C. (2025) · Reforma y democracia. · doi:10.69733/clad.ryd.n90.a403
Relating Collaborative Capacity to Social-Ecological Outcomes in the United States– Bridging Academic and Practitioner Perspectives
Land, S. R., Baxter, J., Mickel, A. E., Bixler, R. P., Farrell, S., Johnson, S., Carr, W., Robertson, T., Brush, L., & Marchetta, J. (2025) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2025.2553351
“…the academic research with practitioner needs, contributing best practices (Carr Kelman et al. 2023; Jager et al. 2020), evaluation criteria (Conley and Moote 2003), case studies (Mandarano 2008), measures of collaborative influence (Mandarano and Paulsen 2011) and more (Beeton, Cheng, and…”
Policies and frameworks
(2013) · CSIRO Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1071/9780643107052.part03-sec03
Creating, Sustaining, and Improving Collaboration Across Canadian Biospheres Through the Lens of Collective Impact Theory
Ostrem, J., & Hvenegaard, G. T. (2025) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2025.2589241
“…about the potential for collaboration across BRs. Collaboration among stakeholders is an effective and expected strategy to manage natural resources, considering the complexities of today’s environmental, economic, and social worlds (Conley and Moote 2003; Reed 2008; Wondolleck and Yaffee 2000).”
An examination of Illinois Extension's mission and the role of learning partnerships in natural resource management programming
Dolan, M. K. (2011) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
An Evaluation Framework for Best Practices and Expected Outcomes in Collaborative Planning and Water Resource Management
Bradshaw, P., Gunton, T., & Markey, S. (2026) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-026-02493-2 · Cited by 1
“Although collaboration does have challenges, empirical research suggests that plans developed through such processes are advantageous overall (Conley and Moote, 2003; Gunton, 2017; Leach et al., 2002; McKinney and Field, 2008; Sabatier et al., 2005; Susskind et al., 2003).”
Local Government and Community Resilience
der Waldt, G. V. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83708-776-120261010

Authors: CONLEY, A., & MOOTE, M. A.
Affiliations: Northern Arizona University (US)
Venue: Society & Natural Resources
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 2003-05
Volume: 16
Issue: 5
Pages: 371-386
ISSN: 0894-1920 (ISSN-L)
1521-0723
DOI: 10.1080/08941920309181
OpenAlex: W2157693829
Cited by: 505
References: 53
Citations by year: 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 23
FWCI: 13.46
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Society & Natural Resources (publishedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords: collaborative natural resource management, evaluation approaches, evaluation criteria, evaluation standards, collaborative governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Evaluating Collaborative Natural ResourceManagement

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks