Cited by 505Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementPublic Policy and Administration ResearchEvaluation and Performance Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating Collaborative Natural ResourceManagement

CONLEY, ALEXANDER, MOOTE, MARGARET A.·2003·Society & Natural Resources

DOI 10.1080/08941920309181

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this article, we look at the evolving collaborative natural resource management movement in the United States and discuss current calls to evaluate it. We then explore approaches researchers have used to evaluate both specific efforts and the broader movement. Evaluative criteria developed thus far by several researchers show commonalities as well as differences. We argue that evaluation approaches will necessarily vary with the evaluation's intent, the type of collaborative effort being evaluated, and the values of the evaluator. Evaluators need to consider and make explicit their standards for comparison, criteria, and methods in order to clarify the nature of an evaluation and facilitate the synthesis of findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08941920309181

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources
Elinor Ostrom, B., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.9739 · Cited by 3,869
Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems
Kramer, R., & Gray, B. (1990) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258026 · Cited by 2,683
Whose Reality Counts?: Putting the First Last
Chambers, R. (1997) · Cited by 2,379
Utilization-Focused Evaluation
(2018) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781506326139.n729 · Cited by 2,315
Making collaboration work : lessons from innovation in natural resource management
Roush, D. (2002) · Electronic Green Journal · doi:10.5070/g311610473 · Cited by 1,438
Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems
Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944369908976071 · Cited by 1,306
Community Natural Resource Management: Promise, Rhetoric, and Reality
Kellert, J. N. M. S. R. (2000) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/089419200750035575 · Cited by 758
The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement
Susskind, L. E., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (1999) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452231389 · Cited by 730
Representing communities: Histories and politics of community‐based natural resource management
Brosius, J. P., Tsing, A., & Zerner, C. (1998) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941929809381069 · Cited by 578
Planning Through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal
Innes, J. E. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781351179522-13 · Cited by 571

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 505

Examining the Influence of Positionality in Evaluating Collaborative Progress in Natural Resource Management: Reflections of an Academic and a Practitioner
Cheng, A. S., & Randall-Parker, T. (2017) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2017.1295493 · Cited by 23
Community-based forestry on federal lands in the western United States: A synthesis and call for renewed research
Davis, E. J., Hajjar, R., Charnley, S., Moseley, C., Wendel, K. L., & Jacobson, M. (2019) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102042 · Cited by 23
The conditions under which farmers are likely to adapt their behaviour: A case study of private land conservation in the Cape Winelands, South Africa
Honig, M., Petersen, S., Shearing, C. D., Pintér, L., & Kotzé, I. (2015) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.016 · Cited by 23
Practicality, Positionality, and Emancipation: Reflections on Participatory Action Research with a Watershed Partnership
Ferreyra, C. (2006) · Systemic Practice and Action Research · doi:10.1007/s11213-006-9044-2 · Cited by 25
Factors influencing success among collaborative sage-grouse management groups in the western United States
Belton, L. R., & Jackson‐Smith, D. B. (2010) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892910000615 · Cited by 34
“The validity of using participant perceptions to gauge group success has occasionally been questioned (Conley & Moote 2003).”
Background
Perception-based Methods to Evaluate Conservation Impact in Forests Managed Through Popular Participation
Lund, J. F., Balooni, K., & Puri, L. (2010) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03487-150305 · Cited by 23
“First, perception-based methods are applied widely in studies of collaborative forest management (Conley and Moote 2003).”
Assessing Collaborative Governance Outcomes and Indicators across Spatial and Temporal Scales: Stewardship Contract Implementation by the United States Forest Service
Mattor, K. M., Cheng, A. S., Kittler, B. A., & McDonough, M. H. (2019) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2019.1665762 · Cited by 25
“The primary research focus has been on economic contributions, employment and personal income (Daniels et al. 2018; Conley and Moote 2003; Koontz and Thomas 2006; Mandarano 2008), although research also suggests that increased efficiency through the pooling and/or leveraging of resources (e.g.…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Benefits of community-based forestry in the US: lessons from a demonstration programme
Danks, C. (2009) · The International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/ifor.11.2.171 · Cited by 22
“…rather than outcomes, in part because many CBF efforts emerged in the 1990s and their long term goals of ecological health and community well-being could not be realised in the short term (Conley and Moote 2003, Fernandez-Gimenez et al. 2008, Koontz and Thomas 2006, McDermott et al., in press).”
Background
Equity first or later? How US community-based forestry distributes benefits
McDermott, M. (2009) · The International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/ifor.11.2.207 · Cited by 22
Shaping Local Context and Outcomes: The Role of Governing Agencies in Collaborative Natural Resource Management
Reed, M. G., Henderson, A. E., & Mendis-Millard, S. (2013) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871209.2013.801003 · Cited by 23
“…persistent and systemic biases in the constitution of collaboratives (Reed & McIlveen, 2006); lack of participant competency in understanding technical jargon and executing negotiation skills (Mascarenhas & Scarce, 2004); and increased time, money, and transaction costs (Conley & Moote, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluential
Erratum to: Visions of Restoration in Fire-Adapted Forest Landscapes: Lessons from the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program
Urgenson, L. S., Ryan, C. M., Halpern, C. B., Bakker, J. D., Belote, R. T., Franklin, J. F., Haugo, R. D., Nelson, C. R., & Waltz, A. E. M. (2017) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-016-0814-z · Cited by 22
Governing Dynamics in Marine Conservation Tourism in Raja Ampat, Indonesia
Atmodjo, E., Lamers, M., & MOL, A. P. J. (2019) · Tourism Planning & Development · doi:10.1080/21568316.2019.1686652 · Cited by 21
The Best Laid Plans: Community-Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) Group Capacity and Planning Success
Mountjoy, N. J., Seekamp, E., Davenport, M. A., & Whiles, M. R. (2013) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-013-0169-7 · Cited by 21
“…Reed 2007; Beckley et al. 2008).1 Although various methods have been employed to assess capacity (see Fiszbien 1997; Walker et al. 2006; Margerum 2007; Pavey et al. 2007 for examples), no single widely accepted method exists (Conley and Moote 2003; MendisMillard and Reed 2007; Beckley et al. 2008).”
BackgroundMethod
Icon Lakes in New Zealand: Managing the Tension Between Land Development and Water Resource Protection
Edgar, N. B. (2008) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920802223325 · Cited by 21
Fishing for a solution: can collaborative resource management reduce poverty and support conservation?
Solomon, J. N., Jacobson, S. K., & Liu, I. (2011) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892911000403 · Cited by 20
“…used to describe different programmes (such as community-based conservation, collaborative conservation and integrated environmental management; Conley & Moote 2003), but generally refers to resource management shared by at least two different stakeholders (one often being a government…”
Background
A Conceptual Framework to Enable the Changes Required for a One-Planet Future
Honig, M., Petersen, S., Herbstein, T., Roux, S., Nel, D., & Shearing, C. D. (2015) · Environmental Values · doi:10.3197/096327115x14384223590258 · Cited by 24
Capacity Building: A New Focus for Collaborative Approaches to Community-Based Suburban Deer Management?
Raik, D. B., Decker, D. J., & Siemer, W. F. (2006) · Wildlife Society Bulletin · doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[525:cbanff]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 20
“Socioeconomic criteria include 1) improved relationships and partnerships, 2) increased trust, 3) greater knowledge and understanding among participants, and 4) improved capacity to engage in decision making (Lauber and Knuth 2000, Conley and Moote 2003).”
Background
Evaluating participatory decision processes: Which methods inform reflective practice?
Kaufman, S., Ozawa, C. P., & Shmueli, D. F. (2013) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.08.002 · Cited by 20
“…under dispute (a confounding factor in earlier efforts), some evaluators have focused on conflicts over specific resources: water (d’Estree & Colby, 2003; Scholz & Stiftel, 2005), waste management (Susskind and Ozawa, 1983), resources management (Conley & Moote, 2003) or enforcement (Siegel, 2007).”
Background
Evaluating Ecosystem Management Capabilities at the Local Level in Florida: Identifying Policy Gaps Using Geographic Information Systems
Brody, S. D., Carrasco, V., & Highfield, W. (2003) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-003-3035-1 · Cited by 20
A framework for monitoring social process and outcomes in environmental programs
Chapman, S. (2014) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.07.004 · Cited by 19
Monitoring and evaluation to support adaptive co-management: Lessons learned from the Millennium Villages Project
Chapman, S., Sullivan, C., Palm, C. A., Huynh, U. K., Diru, W., & Masira, J. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.014 · Cited by 20
A Word to the Wise: Advice for Scientists Engaged in Collaborative Adaptive Management
Hopkinson, P., Huber, A., Saah, D. S., & Battles, J. J. (2017) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0825-4 · Cited by 19
“Collaboration can encompass many related processes (Conley and Moote 2003; Reed 2008; Susskind et al. 2012): engaging stakeholders in natural resources management; incorporating local knowledge; increasing mutual learning; reducing conflict; building relationships; and maximizing the diversity of…”
Background
Identifying capacity indicators for community-based natural resource management initiatives: focus group results from conservation practitioners across Illinois
Mountjoy, N. J., Seekamp, E., Davenport, M. A., & Whiles, M. R. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.743880 · Cited by 19
“…over natural resources devolves to the local level, the question of the capacity of CBNRM initiatives to meet conservation challenges has become increasingly important (Bradshaw 2003, Conley and Moote 2003, Margerum 2007, Mendis-Millard and Reed 2007, Beckley et al. 2008, Brinkman et al. 2012).”
Background
A Retrospective Assessment of a Failed Collaborative Process in Conservation
Kretser, H. E., Beckmann, J. P., & Berger, J. (2018) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-018-1045-2 · Cited by 19
Monitoring tourists’ specialisation and implementing adaptive governance is necessary to avoid failure of the wildlife tourism commons
Mancini, F., Leyshon, B., Manson, F. J., Coghill, G. M., & Lusseau, D. (2020) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104160 · Cited by 23
Process Makes Perfect: Perceptions of Effectiveness in Collaborative Environmental Governance
Lindgren, A. Y., Reed, M. G., & Robson, J. P. (2021) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-020-01402-5 · Cited by 22
The Effects of Employees’ Perceived Intrinsic Motivation on Knowledge Sharing and Creative Self-Efficacy
Sun, Y., Hong, J., & Ye, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.762994 · Cited by 33
Monitoring the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) framework using evaluation of effectiveness methods. The Italian case
Marino, D., Marucci, A., Palmieri, M., & Gaglioppa, P. (2015) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.025 · Cited by 18
Social Learning Through Environmental Risk Analysis of Biodiversity and GM Maize in South Africa
Dana, G. V., & Nelson, K. C. (2012) · Environmental Policy and Governance · doi:10.1002/eet.1587 · Cited by 18
Integrating knowledge, interests and values through modelling in participatory processes: dimensions of legitimacy
Ginger, C. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.761132 · Cited by 18
“…in promoting public engagement (Renn, Webler, and Wiedemann 1995; Thomas 1995; Steelman and Ascher 1997; Rhoads et al. 1999; Haight and Ginger 2000; Lawrence and Deagen 2001; Beierle and Cayford 2002; Conley and Moote 2003; Adams 2004; Innes and Booher 2004; Kinsella 2004; Koontz et al. 2004).”
Background
Incorporating Social and Ecological Adaptive Capacity into Vulnerability Assessments and Management Decisions for Biodiversity Conservation
Petersen, B., Aslan, C. E., Stuart, D., & Beier, P. (2018) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biy020 · Cited by 18
Natural resource management in an institutional disorder : the development of adaptive co-management systems of moose in Sweden
Gasper, S. W.-D. (2008) · Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) · Cited by 18
Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA
Childs, C., York, A. M., White, D. D., Schoon, M., & Bodner, G. S. (2013) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-05636-180411 · Cited by 17
“…approaches that have been described in the applied natural resource management literature as promising avenues for negotiation, conflict management, building of credibility and trust, and fulfillment of the ideals of representative governance in a democratic society (Conley and Moote 2003).”
Background
Enhancing source water protection and watershed management: Lessons from the case of the New Brunswick Water Classification Initiative
Baird, J., Plummer, R., Morris, S., Mitchell, S., & Rathwell, K. (2014) · Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · doi:10.1080/07011784.2013.872872 · Cited by 17
Tracking a Governance Transition: Identifying and Measuring Indicators of Social Forestry on the Willamette National Forest
Abrams, J., Huber‐Stearns, H., Gosnell, H., Santo, A. R., Duffey, S., & Moseley, C. (2019) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2019.1605434 · Cited by 17
An Empirical Evaluation of the Impact of Collaboration on the Pace and Scale of National Forest Management in Idaho
McIver, C. P., & Becker, D. R. (2021) · Forest Science · doi:10.1093/forsci/fxaa040 · Cited by 17
How success is evaluated in collaborative invasive species management: A systematic review
Abeysinghe, N., Guerrero, A. M., Rhodes, J. R., McDonald‐Madden, E., & O’Bryan, C. J. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119272 · Cited by 16
Creating socio-economic measures for community-based natural resource management: a case from watershed stewardship organisations
Hibbard, M., & Lurie, S. D. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2011.614093 · Cited by 16
“Performance measures are concerned with the behaviour of an organisation or system, for example building consensus or producing watershed assessments (Conley and Moote 2003).”
Background
Perceptions of Success and the Question of Consensus in Natural Resource Collaboration: Lessons from an Inactive Collaborative Group
Rudeen, A. K., Fernández‐Giménez, M. E., Thompson, J., & Meiman, P. J. (2012) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2011.653518 · Cited by 15
Service-learning: a tool to create social capital for collaborative natural resource management
Coleman, K., & Danks, C. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-015-0239-7 · Cited by 24
“Collaboration can be time-consuming, making it difficult to address urgent issues with a collaborative approach; power inequalities among participants can disrupt the collaborative process; small scale collaboration tends to work better than larger scale ones, limiting the appropriateness of the collaborative approach…”
Background
Evaluating Participatory Initiatives in South Africa
Brown, J. (2014) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244014531966 · Cited by 15
“As Conley and Moote (2003) point out, documenting “outcomes is easiest when they are readily quantified, and where there is sufficient baseline information to allow reliable comparisons” (p. 379), which goes some way to justify Mog’s (2004) assessment of sustainability evaluations as being an…”
BackgroundInfluential
Generating Co-Management at Kasha Katuwe Tent Rocks National Monument, New Mexico
Pinel, S. L., & Pecos, J. (2012) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-012-9814-9 · Cited by 15
The ‘Third Sector’ and Poverty Reduction in Developing Societies
Yeboah‐Assiamah, E., Musah-Surugu, I. J., Bawole, J. N., & Suleiman, N. (2015) · International Journal of Rural Management · doi:10.1177/0973005215601944 · Cited by 15
“The above response is crucial in that it highlights an observation by Tvedt (1998) that one of the critical success factors of NGO activities is the ability to involve potential beneficiaries in deciding what ventures they want to embark on, and also argued by Conley and Moote (2003) that collaboration arrangement is…”
Background
SCOTLAND'S APPROACH TO PARTICIPATORY PLANNING: CHARACTERISING THE CHARRETTE
Kennedy, A. (2017) · International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR · doi:10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i2.1265 · Cited by 15
Rebuilding Yunesit’in fire (Qwen) stewardship: Learnings from the land
Nikolakis, W. D., & Ross, R. M. (2022) · The Forestry Chronicle · doi:10.5558/tfc2022-001 · Cited by 14
Corporate social responsibility as relief from responsibility
Herlin, H., & Solitander, N. (2017) · Critical Perspectives on International Business · doi:10.1108/cpoib-04-2015-0013 · Cited by 14
History and the Commons: A necessary conversation
Laborda-Pemán, M., & Tine De Moor, A. (2016) · International Journal of the Commons · doi:10.18352/ijc.769 · Cited by 14
No sense of ownership in weak participation: a forest conservation experiment in Tanzania
Handberg, Ø. N. (2018) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x18000190 · Cited by 14
The challenges of participatory and systemic environmental management: from aspiration to implementation
Eastwood, A., Fischer, A., & Byg, A. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2016.1249787 · Cited by 14
“…from evaluation studies on processes and outcomes of participatory or systemic approaches is that they are usually based on end-of-project evaluations and are generally summative (Conley and Moote 2003; Kaufman, Ozawa, and Shmueli 2014; Trimble and L azaro 2014; Valls-Donderis et al. 2013).”
Background
Empowerment and Participation: How could the wide range of social effects of participatory approaches be better elicited and compared?Preprint
D’Aquino, P. (2007) · HAL · Cited by 14
Participatory evaluation in times of governance transition: The case of small-scale fisheries in Uruguay
Trimble, M., & Plummer, R. (2018) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.04.027 · Cited by 13
Protecting Natural Resources on Private Lands: The Role of Collaboration in Land-Use Planning
Jansujwicz, J. S., & Calhoun, A. J. K. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9575-6_10 · Cited by 13
Monitoring changes in forest resource advisory groups’ composition and evaluations of perceptions of public participation effectiveness: a case of Ontario’s Local Citizens Committees
Hunt, L. M. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2015-0241 · Cited by 13
“, Aboriginal people) population survey approaches to understand the reasons for evaluations of processes (Conley and Moote 2003), differences in attitudes and environmental value orientations between participants and nonparticipants (McFarlane and Boxall 1996), and the types of acting roles that participants play to o…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Rethinking Effective Public Engagement in Sustainable Forest Governance
Nenko, A. S., Parkins, J. R., Reed, M. G., & Sinclair, A. J. (2019) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1539198 · Cited by 13
“Conley and Moote (2003) note that governance models like these are a way of reducing conflict among stakeholders, building social capital and establishing environmental, social, and economic issues to be addressed in ways that can produce better decisions.”
Background
A collaborative model for large‐scale riparian restoration in the western United States
Oppenheimer, J. D., Beaugh, S. K., Knudson, J. A., Mueller, P., Grant‐Hoffman, N., Clements, A., & Wight, M. (2014) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.12166 · Cited by 13
“Collaborations have been credited with enhancing social capital, community understanding, and ecological conditions (Conley & Moote 2003).”
Background
Seeking red herrings in the wood: tending the shared spaces of environmental and feminist geographies
Reed, M. G. (2007) · Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.2007.00162.x · Cited by 13
Policing in the wild: the game wardens' perspective
Patten, R. (2010) · Policing An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13639511011020638 · Cited by 13
Evaluating co-management in the Sundarbans mangrove forest of Bangladesh: success and limitations from local forest users’ perspectives
Siddique, M. R. H., Hossain, M., Rashid, A. Z. M. M., Khan, N. A., Shuvo, S. N., & Hassan, M. K. (2024) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-14905-290208 · Cited by 14
Declining trends in plan quality: A longitudinal evaluation of regional environmental plans in Queensland, Australia
Lukasiewicz, A., Vella, K. J., Mayere, S., & Baker, D. C. (2020) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103891 · Cited by 12
Understanding Water Use Conflicts to Advance Collaborative Planning: Lessons Learned from Lake Diefenbaker, Canada
Chilima, J. S., Blakley, J., Diaz, H., & Bharadwaj, L. A. (2021) · Water · doi:10.3390/w13131756 · Cited by 13
“Unlike the rigid top-down (rational) approach to planning that is carried out for water systems by government actors alone [43,44], which has failed to establish transformational water governance and management practices in the eyes of diverse water users, and to bring about implementation of needed water reforms [1,1…”
Background
Social and Economic Aspects of the Transmission of Pathogenic Bacteria between Wildlife and Food Animals: A Thematic Analysis of Published Research Knowledge
Fournier, A. M., Young, I., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., & LeJeune, J. (2015) · Zoonoses and Public Health · doi:10.1111/zph.12179 · Cited by 12
“This approach aims to encourage knowledge sharing, trust and commitment among stakeholders to achieve more robust and joint solutions (Conley and Moote, 2003; Reed et al., 2013).”
Background
Avoiding post-truth environmental conflict in New Zealand: communicating uncertainties in endangered species science
Palliser, A., & Dodson, G. (2019) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.18040205 · Cited by 12
Catalytic and structural factors behind advancements of co-management in protected areas: Contributions for its evaluation
Prado, D. S., Seixas, C. S., & Trimble, M. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114825 · Cited by 12
Community, Place, and Conservation
Theodori, G. L., & Kyle, G. T. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5802-5_5 · Cited by 12
Ecoregional Planning
Mason, R. (2011) · Journal of Planning Literature · doi:10.1177/0885412211411091 · Cited by 12
Who’s in Charge: Role Clarity in a Midwestern Watershed Group
Floress, K. M., Prokopy, L. S., & Ayres, J. (2011) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-011-9724-2 · Cited by 12
Conserving Vernal Pool Habitat through Community Based Conservation
Calhoun, A. J. K., & Reilly, P. (2007) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420005394.ch16 · Cited by 12
Operationalizing the social capital of collaborative environmental governance with network metrics
Nesbitt, H. K., Hamilton, M., Ulibarrí, N., & Williamson, M. A. (2024) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad7bd0 · Cited by 13
“…is invoked as the mediating variable between collaboration and outcomes, whereby collaboration enables individuals to leverage resources and knowledge to solve problems they could not address alone (Pretty and Ward 2001, Conley and Moote 2003, Mandarano 2008, Dressel et al 2020, Koontz et al 2020).”
Does collaborative governance increase public confidence in water management? Survey evidence from Aotearoa New Zealand
Tadaki, M., Sinner, J., Brown, P. H., & Greenhalgh, S. (2020) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 11
PARTISIPASI PUBLIK DALAM COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE PADA PROGRAM SISTER CITY BANDUNG DAN JEPANG DALAM MENANGGULANGI SAMPAH DI KOTA BANDUNG
Bustomi, T., Ariesmansyah, A., & Kusdiman, A. (2022) · Kebijakan Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi · doi:10.23969/kebijakan.v13i1.5037 · Cited by 11
Performance Management of Natural Resources: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework for China
Zhang, Z., Jin, G., Hu, Y., He, N., & Niu, J. (2022) · Water · doi:10.3390/w14203338 · Cited by 12
Tracking collaboration: forest planning and local participation on the San Juan National Forest, Colorado
Wilson, R. K., & Crawford, T. W. (2008) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549830802260134 · Cited by 11
“However, the rapid proliferation of CBCs has tended to outpace efforts to evaluate their resultant impacts (Kenney 1999, Conley and Moote 2003).”
Background
Creating a Dialogue for Effective Collaborative Decision-making: A Case Study with Michigan Stakeholders
Dreelin, E. A., & Rose, J. B. (2008) · Journal of Great Lakes Research · doi:10.3394/0380-1330(2008)34[12:cadfec]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 12
“There are many definitions of collaborative decision-making; we use the definition by Conley and Moote (2003), who define collaborative decision-making as multiparty programs and processes that use a participatory approach.”
Method
Practitioner evaluations of participatory processes in environmental decision making
Burgess, J. A., & Clark, J. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807756.010 · Cited by 10
Responsibilization dynamics in naṭural resource management: Insights from two protected areas in Cameroon
Manu, G., Kimengsi, J. N., & Mbatu, R. S. (2023) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126402 · Cited by 10
Managing water through change and uncertainty: comparing lessons from the adaptive co-management literature to recent policy developments in England
Whaley, L., & Weatherhead, E. K. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1090959 · Cited by 10
Evaluating ecological outcomes from environmental stewardship initiatives: A comparative analysis of approaches
Baird, J., Plummer, R., Jollineau, M., & Dale, G. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113266 · Cited by 10
Socioeconomic impacts of urban restoration in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil
Lemgruber, L., Maioli, V., Latawiec, A. E., Solórzano, A., de Moraes, L. F. D., Lino, E. D. D. S. M., Pena, I. A. D. B., & Strassburg, B. B. N. (2021) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127271 · Cited by 10
“Further than just evaluating processes and environmental aspects, evaluative criteria for restoration projects also include socioeconomic outcomes (Conley and Moote, 2003).”
Background
An Assessment Framework for Integrated Food-Energy-Water Nexus Governance: Application to the Cases of Phoenix and Cape Town
Jones-Crank, J. L., White, D. D., Aggarwal, R., & Melnick, R. (2022) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2022.2063463 · Cited by 10
Participant perceptions of consensus-based, marine mammal take reduction planning
McDonald, S. L., & Rigling-Gallagher, D. (2015) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.08.004 · Cited by 10
What Kind of Research and Development is Needed for Natural Resource Management?
Campbell, B., Hagmann, J., Sayer, J. A., Stroud, A., Thomas, R. J., & Wollenberg, E. K. (2006) · Water International · doi:10.1080/02508060608691937 · Cited by 10
“Hall et al., 2001; Conley and Moote, 2003 ).”
Background
Unpacking participatory NRM : distinguishing resource capture from democratic governance
Currie-Alder, B. A. B. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9781315596396-24 · Cited by 10
Best practices for collaborative conservation philanthropy
Sanderson, J. S., Alper, R., Barrack, J., Byrd, C., Glenn, E., Jespersen, K., Kimple, A., Knight, H., Konrad, P., Kowalski, T., et al. (2022) · Conservation Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/csp2.12811 · Cited by 10
“It can reduce conflict and help groups achieve common environmental, social, and economic goals (Conley & Moote, 2003; Gray, 1989).”
Background
Drivers of social acceptance of natural-resource management: A comparison of the public and professionals in California
Eriksson, M., Safeeq, M., Padilla, L., Pathak, T. B., O’Geen, T., Egoh, B. N., Lugg, J., & Bales, R. C. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118605 · Cited by 9
Collaborative governance challenges in energy efficiency and conservation: The case of Pennsylvania
Guo, J., Mallinson, D. J., Ortiz, S. E., & Iulo, L. D. (2024) · Utilities Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jup.2024.101721 · Cited by 9
Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM): A Case Study of Durlung Watershed, Bagmati Zone, Nepal
Khanna, S. A., Shrestha, K. L., Maskey, R. K., Lamsal, A., Pyakurel, K., Poudyal, M., Ranjit, M., Karki, D., Aryal, R., & Shrestha, A. (2016) · Hydro Nepal Journal of Water Energy and Environment · doi:10.3126/hn.v18i0.14645 · Cited by 9
Coral reefs management and decision making tools
Hilmi, N., Safa, A., Sumalia, U. R., & Cinar, M. (2017) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.06.006 · Cited by 9
From “Vision” to Reality: Emerging Public Opinion of Collaborative Management in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
Epstein, K., Smutko, L. S., & Western, J. M. (2018) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1456591 · Cited by 9
“Because collaborative resource management aligns generally with emerging science-driven opinions on “best practices” for environmental management (Conley and Moote 2003), and more recently a shift toward ecosystem management and away from command and control (Holling and Meffe 1996), interagency…”
BackgroundInfluential
Conflicts Between Farmers and Conservationists: The Role of Communication in the Management of Natural Resources
Meierová, T. (2020) · Journal of Landscape Ecology · doi:10.2478/jlecol-2020-0013 · Cited by 9
“Collaborative partnership studies that attempt to address land use conflicts are available, for instance, by Van Bommel et al. (2009), (2010), Ravnborg & Vesternbarn (2014), Conley & Moote (2003), and Bidwell & Ryan (2006).”
Background
Comparative Analysis between the Role of Local Communities in Regional Development inside Japanese and Russian UNESCO’s Biosphere Reserves: Case Studies of Mount Hakusan and Katunskiy Biosphere Reserves
Mammadova, A., Smith, C. D., & Yashina, T. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su131810422 · Cited by 9
“The local involvement plays a key role in sustainable ecosystem management and the development of the community capacity [7] as well as being mentioned in the MAB Strategy and the LAP.”
Background
Cooptation et résistance dans la planification forestière concertée au Québec
Fortier, J.-F., & Wyatt, S. W. (2014) · Recherches amérindiennes au Québec · doi:10.7202/1027878ar · Cited by 9
Context and capacity: The potential for performance-based agricultural water quality policy
Baird, J., Belcher, K. W., & Quinn, M. S. (2014) · Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · doi:10.1080/07011784.2014.965033 · Cited by 9
Re-Staging La Rasgioni: Lessons Learned from Transforming a Traditional Form of Conflict Resolution to Engage Stakeholders in Agricultural Water Governance
Ruiu, M. L., Maurizi, S., Sassu, S., Seddaiu, G., Zuin, O., Blackmore, C., & Roggero, P. P. (2017) · Water · doi:10.3390/w9040297 · Cited by 9
“by collaborative natural resource management [25,26].”
Adaptation through Collaboration: Evaluating the Emergence of Institutional Arrangements for Catchment Management and Governance in England
Watson, N. (2015) · International Journal of Water Governance · doi:10.7564/13-ijwg26 · Cited by 12
Funding Science that Links to Decisions: Case Studies Involving Coastal Land Use Planning Projects
Matso, K. E., & Becker, M. L. (2013) · Estuaries and Coasts · doi:10.1007/s12237-013-9649-5 · Cited by 9
Learning forest devolution: an assessment tool developed in Vietnam for forest departments
Sikor, T. O., Tân, N. Q., & Thanh, T. N. (2005) · The International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/ifor.2005.7.4.320 · Cited by 9
What went right? A collaborative process to prepare a city forest management strategy
Saarikoski, H., Luoma, E., Bor, S., & Polsa, P. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2023.2258524 · Cited by 8
“Our research approach is a single case study analysis (Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007) using a combination of neutral, third-party evaluation and participatory evaluation (Conley & Moote, 2003).”
BackgroundMethod
Navigating the pathway from collaborative governance to impacts under uncertainty: A theory of change for watershed visions
Haapasaari, P., Marttunen, M., Salokannel, V., & Similä, J. (2024) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103937 · Cited by 11
Unravelling how collaboration impacts success of invasive species management
Abeysinghe, N., O’Bryan, C. J., Guerrero, A. M., Rhodes, J. R., & McDonald‐Madden, E. (2023) · People and Nature · doi:10.1002/pan3.10544 · Cited by 9
Evaluating the Process and Outcomes of Collaborative Conservation: Tools, Techniques, and Strategies
Thomas, R. E. W., & Allegretti, A. M. (2019) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2019.1692116 · Cited by 8
“As Conley and Moote (2003) posited, evaluating the outcomes of collaborative conservation will be influenced by the varying motivations, desires, timelines, and personal goals of stakeholders.”
Background

Authors: CONLEY, A., & MOOTE, M. A.
Affiliations: Northern Arizona University (US)
Venue: Society & Natural Resources
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 2003-05
Volume: 16
Issue: 5
Pages: 371-386
ISSN: 0894-1920 (ISSN-L)
1521-0723
DOI: 10.1080/08941920309181
OpenAlex: W2157693829
Cited by: 505
References: 53
Citations by year: 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 23
FWCI: 13.46
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Society & Natural Resources (publishedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords: collaborative natural resource management, evaluation approaches, evaluation criteria, evaluation standards, collaborative governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Evaluating Collaborative Natural ResourceManagement

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks