Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS OF INSPIRATORY AIRFLOW IN THE HUMAN NOSE AND NASOPHARYNX

Subramaniam, Ravi.P., Richardson, Regina.B., Morgan, Kevin.T., Kimbell, Julia.S., Guilmette, Raymond.A.·1998·Inhalation Toxicology

Abstract

Extrapolation of the regional dose of an inhaled xenobiotic from laboratory animals to humans for purposes of assessing human health risk is problematic because of large interspecies differences in nasal respiratory physiology and airway anatomy. There is a need for dosimetry models that can adjust for these differences in the upper respiratory tract. The present work extends previous efforts in this laboratory and elsewhere to simulate nasal airflow profiles numerically in laboratory animals and humans. A three-dimensional, anatomically accurate representation of an adult human nasal cavity and nasopharynx was constructed. The Navier-Stokes and continuity equations for airflow were solved using the finite-element method under steady-state, inspiratory conditions simulating rest and light exercise (steady-state inspiratory flow rates: 15 L/min and 26 L/min, respectively) with the fluid dynamics software package FIDAP. Simulated airflow was streamlined in the main nasal passages and complex in the vestibule and nasopharynx. Swirling air currents and recirculating flow were predicted in the nasal vestibule, and the expansion at the nasopharynx gave rise to two downward, countercurrent, spiraling vortices. Significant lateral flow was observed mainly in the middle lateral meatus. Flow apportionment among different regions of the nose remained almost unchanged between the two inspiratory rates simulated. Fastest flow occurred in the posterior nasal valve region. In the main nasal airway, the highest airspeeds occurred through the ventral and middle medial regions. Simulated velocity fields and pressure drops across the nasal cavity generally agreed with experimental results from the literature. It is proposed that this model can be used to reduce uncertainty in human health risk assessment for inhaled materials and to assess changes in airflow and nasal resistance due to common surgical procedures and medical conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/089583798197772

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Subramaniam, R. P., Richardson, R. B., Morgan, K. T., Kimbell, J. S., & Guilmette, R. A.
Venue
Inhalation Toxicology
Published
1998-01
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
91-120
ISSN
  • 0895-8378 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7691
OpenAlex
W1846672435
Cited by
269
References
18
FWCI
8.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS OF INSPIRATORY AIRFLOW IN THE HUMAN NOSE AND NASOPHARYNX. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/089583798197772
The paper
Subramaniam, R. P., Richardson, R. B., Morgan, K. T., Kimbell, J. S., & Guilmette, R. A. (1998). COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS OF INSPIRATORY AIRFLOW IN THE HUMAN NOSE AND NASOPHARYNX. Inhalation Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1080/089583798197772

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.