The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Numerical Simulation of Airflow in the Human Nasal Cavity
Abstract
An anatomically correct finite element mesh of the right human nasal cavity was constructed from CAT scans of a healthy adult nose. The steady-state Navier-Stokes and continuity equations were solved numerically to determine the laminar airflow patterns in the nasal cavity at quiet breathing flow rates. In the main nasal passages, the highest inspiratory air speed occurred along the nasal floor (below the inferior turbinate), and a second lower peak occurred in the middle of the airway (between the inferior and middle turbinates and the septum). Nearly 30 percent of the inspired volumetric flow passed below the inferior turbinate and about 10 percent passed through the olfactory airway. Secondary flows were induced by curvature and rapid changes in cross-sectional area of the airways, but the secondary velocities were small in comparison with the axial velocity through most of the main nasal passages. The flow patterns changed very little as total half-nasal flow rate varied between resting breathing rates of 125 m/s and 200 ml/s. During expiration, the peaks in velocity were smaller than inspiration, and the flow was more uniform in the turbinate region. Inspiratory streamline patterns in the model were determined by introducing neutrally buoyant point particles at various locations on the external naris plane, and tracking their path based on the computed flow field. Only the stream from the ventral tip of the naris reached the olfactory airway. The numerically computed velocity field was compared with the experimentally measured velocity field in a large scale (20×) physical model, which was built by scaling up from the same CAT scans. The numerical results showed good agreement with the experimental measurements at different locations in the airways, and confirmed that at resting breathing flow rates, airflow through the nasal cavity is laminar.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Harkema, J. R., Carey, S. A., & Wagner, J. G. (2006) · Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1080/01926230600713475 · Cited by 511
The Sniff Is Part of the Olfactory Percept
Mainland, J., & Sobel, N. (2006) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/bjj012 · Cited by 392
Effect of Anatomy on Human Nasal Air Flow and Odorant Transport Patterns: Implications for Olfaction
Zhao, K. (2004) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/bjh033 · Cited by 361
COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS OF INSPIRATORY AIRFLOW IN THE HUMAN NOSE AND NASOPHARYNX
Subramaniam, R. P., Richardson, R. B., Morgan, K. T., Kimbell, J. S., & Guilmette, R. A. (1998) · Inhalation Toxicology · doi:10.1080/089583798197772 · Cited by 269
The Air-Conditioning Capacity of the Human Nose
Naftali, S., Rosenfeld, M., Wolf, M., & Elad, D. (2005) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-005-2513-4 · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Keyhani, K., Scherer, P. W., & Mozell, M. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 1995-11-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 429-441
- ISSN
- 0148-0731 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-8951
- OpenAlex
- W2076074467
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Numerical Simulation of Airflow in the Human Nasal Cavity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1115/1.2794204
- The paper
- Keyhani, K., Scherer, P. W., & Mozell, M. M. (1995). Numerical Simulation of Airflow in the Human Nasal Cavity. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2794204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.