The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pros and Cons of the Liposome Platform in Cancer Drug Targeting
Abstract
Coating of liposomes with polyethylene-glycol (PEG) by incorporation in the liposome bilayer of PEG-derivatized lipids results in inhibition of liposome uptake by the reticulo-endothelial system and significant prolongation of liposome residence time in the blood stream. Parallel developments in drug loading technology have improved the efficiency and stability of drug entrapment in liposomes, particularly with regard to cationic amphiphiles such as anthracyclines. An example of this new generation of liposomes is a formulation of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin known as Doxil or Caelyx, whose clinical pharmacokinetic profile is characterized by slow plasma clearance and small volume of distribution. A hallmark of these long-circulating liposomal drug carriers is their enhanced accumulation in tumors. The mechanism underlying this passive targeting effect is the phenomenon known as enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) which has been described in a broad variety of experimental tumor types. Further to the passive targeting effect, the liposome drug delivery platform offers the possibility of grafting tumor-specific ligands on the liposome membrane for active targeting to tumor cells, and potentially intracellular drug delivery. The pros and cons of the liposome platform in cancer targeting are discussed vis-à-vis nontargeted drugs, using as an example a liposome drug delivery system targeted to the folate receptor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maeda, H. (2001) · Advances in Enzyme Regulation · doi:10.1016/s0065-2571(00)00013-3 · Cited by 2,495
Cited by
Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy
Peer, D., Karp, J. M., Hong, S., Farokhzad, O. C., Margalit, R., & Langer, R. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.387 · Cited by 8,710
Liposomes: Structure, composition, types, and clinical applications
Nsairat, H., Khater, D., Sayed, U., Odeh, F., Al Bawab, A., & Alshaer, W. (2022) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09394 · Cited by 1,561
Nicolas, J., Mura, S., Brambilla, D., Mackiewicz, N., & Couvreur, P. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35265f · Cited by 1,270
Intracellular targeting delivery of liposomal drugs to solid tumors based on EPR effects
Maruyama, K. (2011) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2010.09.003 · Cited by 601
Extracellularly Activated Nanocarriers: A New Paradigm of Tumor Targeted Drug Delivery
Gullotti, E., & Yeo, Y. (2009) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp900090z · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Gabizon, A. A., Shmeeda, H., & Zalipsky, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Liposome Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 175-183
- ISSN
- 0898-2104 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2394
- OpenAlex
- W2139713707
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pros and Cons of the Liposome Platform in Cancer Drug Targeting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08982100600848769
- The paper
- Gabizon, A. A., Shmeeda, H., & Zalipsky, S. (2006). Pros and Cons of the Liposome Platform in Cancer Drug Targeting. Journal of Liposome Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982100600848769
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.