Cited by 58School Choice and PerformanceEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

A seasonal perspective on school effectiveness: evidence from a Flemish longitudinal study in kindergarten and first grade

Verachtert, Pieter, Van Damme, Jan, Onghena, Patrick, Ghesquière, Pol·2009·School Effectiveness and School Improvement

Abstract

Summer learning studies have been set up to investigate the evolution of initial group differences in academic achievement, for example, between low- and high-socioeconomic status (SES) children. Moreover, this approach has been used to demonstrate the absolute effect of going to school on children's learning. In the present study, we used multilevel piecewise linear growth modeling to analyze growth in mathematics skills throughout kindergarten and 1st grade. First, we added to the evidence of an absolute schooling effect by demonstrating that average learning rates were faster during both school years than during the intervening summer vacation. Second, mathematics achievement gaps between children from different socioeconomic, ethnic, and linguistic backgrounds were found to remain stable during kindergarten and the summer vacation. During 1st grade, however, the ethnic and linguistic achievement gaps disappeared, whereas the SES achievement gap remained unchanged. Finally, we found no evidence for school-level variation in summer learning rates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09243450902883896

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early influential studies found that summer is a time when socioeconomic learning gaps widen, but this finding has failed to replicate in more recent studies or in European samples.

    “Although early influential studies also found that summer is a time when socioeconomic learning gaps widen, this finding has failed to replicate in more recent studies (8, 9) or in European samples (48, 49).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verachtert, P., Van Damme, J., Onghena, P., & Ghesquière, P.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Verachtert, Pieter
Venue
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
Published
2009-06
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
215-233
ISSN
  • 0924-3453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5124
OpenAlex
W1973561282
Cited by
58
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
16.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • School Effectiveness and School Improvement (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
summer learning loss, school effectiveness, mathematics achievement, kindergarten, first grade, socioeconomic status, ethnic achievement gap, language background, achievement gap, school-level variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review