Cited by 19Retinal Imaging and AnalysisOphthalmology and Visual Health ResearchRetinal Diseases and Treatments

Utility of 1% Tropicamide in Improving the Quality of Images for Tele-Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients with Dark Irides

Banaee, Touka, Ansari-Astaneh, Mohammad-Reza, Pourreza, Hamidreza, Faal Hosseini, Fatemeh, Vatanparast, Maryam, Shoeibi, Nasser, Jami, Vajihe·2017·Ophthalmic Epidemiology

Abstract

Purpose To compare the quality of fundus photographs taken before and after instillation of one drop of tropicamide. Methods The 45º fundus photographs were taken with a non-mydriatic fundus camera in three conditions of the pupil; pre-mydriatic, 10 minutes after one drop of tropicamide, and fully dilated. Two photographs were taken in each condition; one centered on the macula and the other on the optic disc. Two vitreoretinal specialists graded the images. Results A total of 1768 fundus photographs of 149 diabetic patients with dark irides were included. There were more ungradable images (38.1% and 50.3%, graders 1 and 2, respectively) in the non-mydriatic state than partially- (4.6% and 11.5%) or fully-dilated (15.4% and 10.0%) conditions (p Conclusion Non-mydriatic fundus photographs have a high rate of ungradable images in patients with dark irides. Instillation of only one drop of tropicamide improves the quality of fundus photographs, which is not furthered by adding more drops. This strategy can be used in tele-ophthalmology programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09286586.2016.1274039

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banaee, T., Ansari-Astaneh, M.-R., Pourreza, H., Faal Hosseini, F., Vatanparast, M., Shoeibi, N., & Jami, V.
Affiliations
  • Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Retina Research Center, Khatam-al-Anbia Eye Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran
  • Department of Computer Sciences, Department of Computer Engineering, School of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
  • Department of Computer Engineering, School of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
  • Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (IR)
Venue
Ophthalmic Epidemiology
Published
2017-06-28
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
217-221
ISSN
  • 0928-6586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5086
OpenAlex
W2730633455
Cited by
19
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ophthalmic Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
tropicamide, diabetic retinopathy, teleophthalmology, fundus photography, image quality, pupil dilation, test-retest reliability
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetic Retinopathy, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Fluorescein Angiography, Fundus Oculi, Humans, Iris, Male, Mass Screening, Mydriatics, Ophthalmic Solutions, Photography, Retina, Retrospective Studies, Telemetry, Tropicamide, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review