Cited by 29Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Parent versus teacher ratings on the BRIEF-preschool version in children with and without ADHD

Open access
Schneider, Heather, Ryan, Matthew, Mahone, E. Mark·2020·Child Neuropsychology

Abstract

Caregiver rating scales represent an important component of comprehensive child neuropsychological assessments for conditions such as Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD); however, low inter-rater reliability (parent vs. teacher) often complicates interpretation. It has been challenging to identify the factors contributing to inter-rater variability, particularly when parents and teachers complete slightly different versions of the same rating scale. The present study examined the associations between parent- and teacher-reported executive functions in 84 children, ages 4–5 years, with and without symptoms of ADHD, using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool (BRIEF-P). Use of the BRIEF-P allows for direct comparison of symptom ratings because parents and teachers complete the exact same measure. Significant associations between raters were observed on 4 of 5 BRIEF-P subscales when rating children with ADHD, but on only 1 subscale when rating typically developing (TD) children. The Shift scale in particular displayed low, non-significant inter-rater association in both groups. Significant group-by-rater interactions were observed for Working Memory and Plan/Organize scales, and driven by larger inter-rater T-score discrepancies in the TD group, such that teachers rated children as having more symptoms than parents. Conversely, examination of raw scores reflected no significant rater differences in the TD group, but significant or nearly significant differences on multiple scales in the ADHD group, such that parents rated more symptoms than teachers. Inter-rater associations for the BRIEF-P appear to vary based on who is being rated (i.e., children with or without ADHD), the specific subscales, and whether standardized or raw scores are analyzed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09297049.2019.1617262

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parents were prone to rate children as having more symptoms than teachers.

    “A study by Schneider, Ryan & Mahone (22), on the other hand, found that parents were prone to rate children as having more symptoms than teachers.”

    From Executive functioning in children with ADHD: Investigating the cross-method correlations between performance tests and rating scales (2024) · cites this paper as Schneider, Ryan & Mahone (22)

    The Abstract reports that, on raw BRIEF-P scores, parents rated more symptoms than teachers for preschool children with ADHD, but found no significant rater difference for typically developing children. The claim omits that limitation and presents the pattern as applying to children generally. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • BRIEF has good internal consistency (αs = .80-.98) and test/retest reliability (rs = .82 for parents, .88 for teachers), but low inter-tester reliability between parent and teacher rating (r = .32).

    “BRIEF’s internal consistency (αs = .80–.98) and test/retest reliability (rs = .82 for parents, .88 for teachers) is good, the inter-tester reliability between parent and teacher rating (r = .32) is, however, low (20,21,22).”

    From Executive functioning in children with ADHD: Investigating the cross-method correlations between performance tests and rating scales (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

    The measurement-properties passage (page not available in our copy) describes acceptable BRIEF-P internal consistency and low-to-modest parent–teacher agreement. The Results report parent–teacher correlations of .30–.34 on four scales in the ADHD group, not a single overall r = .32. Our copy does not substantiate the stated α range or the parent and teacher test–retest coefficients. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneider, H., Ryan, M., & Mahone, E. M.
Affiliations
Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Mahone, E. Mark
Venue
Child Neuropsychology
Published
2019-05-16
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
113-128
ISSN
  • 0929-7049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-4136
OpenAlex
W2945163242
Cited by
29
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Center for Scientific Review (R01 HD068425, U54 HD079123, UL1 RR025005)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
inter-rater reliability, BRIEF-P, executive function, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, preschool children, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, working memory, planning and organization, shifts, typically developing children
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Parents, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review