Cited by 129

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scaffolding Science Talk: The role of teachers' questions in the inquiry classroom

Kawalkar, Aisha, Vijapurkar, Jyotsna·2013·International Journal of Science Education

Abstract

Teachers' questions in the inquiry classroom not only explore and make student thinking explicit in the class but also serve to guide and scaffold it. Several studies analysing teachers' questions and their categories have been reported; however the need for a fine-grained analysis has been felt, especially in the inquiry setting. This study attempts a fine-grained analysis of the rich variety of teachers' questions and their roles in an inquiry science classroom, which are illustrated with vignettes from our classes. We present a sequential typology of teachers' questions that emerged from this empirical study, one that brings out their progression in an inquiry class. We juxtapose them with the ones asked during traditional teaching. We also examine, through teachers' self-reports, their motivations for questioning. This work leads towards a characterisation of the complex process of teaching science as an inquiry that teachers interested in moving towards more constructivist teaching practices in their classrooms may find helpful.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09500693.2011.604684

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Abell S. K., 2000, Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science, 65
  2. Amos S., 2002, Aspects of teaching secondary science: Perspectives on practice, 5, 10.4324/9780203166741 · DOI
  3. Asay L. D., 2010, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 57, 10.1007/s10972-009-9152-9 · DOI
  4. Bloom B., 1956, Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain
  5. Carlsen W. S., 1991, Review of Educational Research, 61, 157, 10.3102/00346543061002157 · DOI
  6. Chin C., 2007, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 815, 10.1002/tea.20171 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cobern W. W., 2010, Research in Science & Technological Education, 28, 81, 10.1080/02635140903513599 · DOI
  8. Crawford B. A., 2005, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 613, 10.1002/tea.20070 · DOI
  9. Dillon J. T., 1988, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20, 127, 10.1080/0022027880200301 · DOI
  10. Elstgeest J., 1985, Primary science: Taking the plunge, 36
  11. Erdogan I., 2008, International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1891, 10.1080/09500690701587028 · DOI
  12. Flick L. B., 2000, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 109, 10.1023/A:1009464707968 · DOI
  13. Graesser A. C., 1994, American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104, 10.3102/00028312031001104 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Harlen W., 1999, Effective teaching of science. A review of research
  15. Jurow S. A., 2005, Linguistics and Education, 16, 275, 10.1016/j.linged.2006.02.002 · DOI
  16. Lehrer R., 2000, Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science, 80
  17. Lemke J. L., 1990, Talking science: Language, learning and values
  18. Lustick D., 2010, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 495, 10.1007/s10972-010-9192-1 · DOI
  19. Marshall J. C., 2009, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 299, 10.1007/s10763-009-9174-y · DOI
  20. Mercer N., 1999, British Educational Research Journal, 25, 95, 10.1080/0141192990250107 · DOI
  21. Mortimer E. F., 2003, Meaning making in secondary science classrooms
  22. National Research Council, 1996, National science education standards
  23. National Research Council, 2000, Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning
  24. O'connor M. C., 1996, Discourse, learning, and schooling, 63, 10.1017/CBO9780511720390.003 · DOI
  25. Roth W. M., 1996, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 709, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199609)33:7<709::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
  26. Ruiz-Primo M. A., 2007, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 57, 10.1002/tea.20163 · DOI
  27. Samarapungavan A., 2008, Science Education, 92, 868, 10.1002/sce.20275 · DOI
  28. Scott P., 1998, Studies in Science Education, 32, 45, 10.1080/03057269808560127 · DOI
  29. Smith E. L., 1993, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 111, 10.1002/tea.3660300202 · DOI
  30. van Zee E. H., 2001, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 159, 10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<159::AID-TEA1002>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  31. Vygotsky L. S., 1978, Mind in society: The development of higher development of higher psychological processes, 79
  32. Watts M., 1995, School Science Review, 76, 91
  33. Wells G., 1993, Linguistics and Education, 5, 1, 10.1016/S0898-5898(05)80001-4 · DOI
  34. Wilen W., 1991, Questioning skills for teachers. What research says to the teacher
  35. Yip D. Y., 2004, Journal of Biological Education, 38, 76, 10.1080/00219266.2004.9655905 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Kawalkar, A., & Vijapurkar, J.
Venue
International Journal of Science Education
Published
2013-08
Volume
35
Issue
12
Pages
2004-2027
ISSN
  • 0950-0693
  • 1464-5289
Cited by
129
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review