The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scaffolding Science Talk: The role of teachers' questions in the inquiry classroom
Abstract
Teachers' questions in the inquiry classroom not only explore and make student thinking explicit in the class but also serve to guide and scaffold it. Several studies analysing teachers' questions and their categories have been reported; however the need for a fine-grained analysis has been felt, especially in the inquiry setting. This study attempts a fine-grained analysis of the rich variety of teachers' questions and their roles in an inquiry science classroom, which are illustrated with vignettes from our classes. We present a sequential typology of teachers' questions that emerged from this empirical study, one that brings out their progression in an inquiry class. We juxtapose them with the ones asked during traditional teaching. We also examine, through teachers' self-reports, their motivations for questioning. This work leads towards a characterisation of the complex process of teaching science as an inquiry that teachers interested in moving towards more constructivist teaching practices in their classrooms may find helpful.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Both teachers used verbal scaffolds in the form of a constructive challenge to respond to incorrect or tentative answers by challenging them to review inconsistent ideas”
From Young Children's Epistemic Operations and Emergent Argumentation in Inquiry‐Based Discussions: The Role of Teacher Questioning and Collaborative Interactions (2025) · cites this paper as Kawalkar and Vijapurkar 2013
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING *
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x · Cited by 8,851 · cited 1×
“They provide the necessary ‘cognitive scaffolding’—helping students ‘to solve a problem, carry out a task or achieve a goal which would be beyond their unassisted efforts’ (Wood, Bruner, & Ross, 1976 , p.”
BackgroundReforming Science Teaching: What Research Says About Inquiry
Anderson, R. D. (2002) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1015171124982 · Cited by 1,140
Classroom Interaction in Science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses
Chin, C. (2006) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690600621100 · Cited by 566 · cited 9×
“back step of the initiation–response–feedback (IRF) pattern of discourse is truly crucial for providing such support and as Wells (1993) points out, when used effectively, it initiates the next cycle of the learning-and-teaching spiral. Mortimer and Scott (2003) described how elaborative feedback from the teacher duri…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUsing Questioning to Guide Student Thinking
van Zee, E., & Minstrell, J. (1997) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0602_3 · Cited by 342
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Abell S. K., 2000, Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science, 65
- Amos S., 2002, Aspects of teaching secondary science: Perspectives on practice, 5, 10.4324/9780203166741 · DOI
- Asay L. D., 2010, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 57, 10.1007/s10972-009-9152-9 · DOI
- Bloom B., 1956, Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain
- Carlsen W. S., 1991, Review of Educational Research, 61, 157, 10.3102/00346543061002157 · DOI
- Chin C., 2007, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 815, 10.1002/tea.20171 · DOI · Paper page
- Cobern W. W., 2010, Research in Science & Technological Education, 28, 81, 10.1080/02635140903513599 · DOI
- Crawford B. A., 2005, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 613, 10.1002/tea.20070 · DOI
- Dillon J. T., 1988, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20, 127, 10.1080/0022027880200301 · DOI
- Elstgeest J., 1985, Primary science: Taking the plunge, 36
- Erdogan I., 2008, International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1891, 10.1080/09500690701587028 · DOI
- Flick L. B., 2000, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 109, 10.1023/A:1009464707968 · DOI
- Graesser A. C., 1994, American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104, 10.3102/00028312031001104 · DOI · Paper page
- Harlen W., 1999, Effective teaching of science. A review of research
- Jurow S. A., 2005, Linguistics and Education, 16, 275, 10.1016/j.linged.2006.02.002 · DOI
- Lehrer R., 2000, Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science, 80
- Lemke J. L., 1990, Talking science: Language, learning and values
- Lustick D., 2010, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 495, 10.1007/s10972-010-9192-1 · DOI
- Marshall J. C., 2009, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 299, 10.1007/s10763-009-9174-y · DOI
- Mercer N., 1999, British Educational Research Journal, 25, 95, 10.1080/0141192990250107 · DOI
- Mortimer E. F., 2003, Meaning making in secondary science classrooms
- National Research Council, 1996, National science education standards
- National Research Council, 2000, Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning
- O'connor M. C., 1996, Discourse, learning, and schooling, 63, 10.1017/CBO9780511720390.003 · DOI
- Roth W. M., 1996, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 709, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199609)33:7<709::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
- Ruiz-Primo M. A., 2007, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 57, 10.1002/tea.20163 · DOI
- Samarapungavan A., 2008, Science Education, 92, 868, 10.1002/sce.20275 · DOI
- Scott P., 1998, Studies in Science Education, 32, 45, 10.1080/03057269808560127 · DOI
- Smith E. L., 1993, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 111, 10.1002/tea.3660300202 · DOI
- van Zee E. H., 2001, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 159, 10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<159::AID-TEA1002>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
- Vygotsky L. S., 1978, Mind in society: The development of higher development of higher psychological processes, 79
- Watts M., 1995, School Science Review, 76, 91
- Wells G., 1993, Linguistics and Education, 5, 1, 10.1016/S0898-5898(05)80001-4 · DOI
- Wilen W., 1991, Questioning skills for teachers. What research says to the teacher
- Yip D. Y., 2004, Journal of Biological Education, 38, 76, 10.1080/00219266.2004.9655905 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Caño, L., & Sanz, J. (2025) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.70010 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Kawalkar, A., & Vijapurkar, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2004-2027
- ISSN
- 0950-0693
- 1464-5289
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review