Cited by 53ICT in Developing CommunitiesLibrary Science and AdministrationLiteracy, Media, and Education

Digital identities, student investments and eGranary as a placed resource

Norton, Bonny, Williams, Carrie-Jane·2012·Language and Education

Abstract

In this article, we draw on our research on the digital portable library, eGranary, undertaken in a rural Ugandan village in 2008, to contribute to place-based studies of digital literacy. Our research project investigated the uptake of eGranary by students in the community, focusing on six secondary students who worked as library scholars in the local library. Drawing on Blommaert's construct of scale, we illustrate how both space and time were implicated in the diverse practices associated with eGranary, and their indexical meanings in the wider community. In addition, with reference to Norton's work on identity and investment, we illustrate how students’ identities shifted over time from trainee to tutor, and how the use of eGranary enhanced what was socially imaginable to the library scholars. We demonstrate that Norton's construct of investment thus serves as a useful complement to Blommaert's construct of scale. We also found, however, that students in the wider community who did not have access to eGranary engaged in practices of resistance. We conclude that while eGranary traveled well to Uganda, the limited local resources available in the community compromised its effectiveness, and may well limit the realization of students’ imagined identities for the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09500782.2012.691514

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The construct of investment extends the notion of uptake because investment indexes issues of identity and imagined futures.

    “Norton and Williams have argued that the construct of investment extends the notion of uptake, given that investment indexes issues of identity and imagined futures.”

    From Identity and a Model of Investment in Applied Linguistics (2015) · cites this paper as Norton and Williams (2012)

  • When students and teachers acquired valued digital skills, their cultural capital and social power grew.

    “While Norton and her colleagues do not suggest that what is socially imaginable is also socially available in the African context, it was clear that as students and teachers developed valued digital skills, they also gained increasing cultural capital and social power.”

    From Identity and a Model of Investment in Applied Linguistics (2015) · cites this paper as Norton & Williams, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norton, B., & Williams, C.-J.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Language and Education
Published
2012-07
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
315-329
ISSN
  • 0950-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-7581
OpenAlex
W2132803388
Cited by
53
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language and Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
digital literacy, digital identity, student investment, scale, high school students, resistance, rural Uganda, Norton

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review