Cited by 100Digital Transformation in IndustryFlexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing SystemsImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society

A framework to design smart manufacturing systems for Industry 5.0 based on the human-automation symbiosis

Open access
Peruzzini, Margherita, Prati, Elisa, Pellicciari, Marcello·2024·International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing

Abstract

The concept of Industry 5.0 (I5.0) promotes the human-centricity as the core value behind the evolution of smart manufacturing systems (SMSs), based on a novel use of digital technologies in the design and management of modern industrial systems to take up the socio-technical challenges. In this context, the paper proposes a Smart Manufacturing Systems Design (SMSD) framework enabling I5.0, based on the human-automation symbiosis. Thanks to an ‘Augmented Digital Twin’ (ADT) able to integrate and digitize all the entities of the factory (i.e. machines, robots, environments, interfaces, people), AI-driven applications can be built to support the user domain and make people and machines co-evolve thanks to a systematic data sharing between physical and digital assets (e.g. digital twin, virtual mock-ups, human-machine interfaces), optimizing factory productivity and workers wellbeing. In this framework, machines and humans can both generate knowledge and learn from each other, generating a virtuous co-evolution, supporting the understanding of the human-machine interplay and the creation of an effective collaboration between people and SMSs. The framework was conceived and validated involving four industrial companies, belonging to diverse sectors, interested in overcoming the current limits of I4.0 lines by including the human factors for future SMS management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0951192x.2023.2257634

Cites

24 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proposed system is an ideal candidate for ensuring optimal resource usage in industrial automation and smart manufacturing systems.

    “As these systems depend on sensor data to make intelligent decisions, the proposed system is an ideal candidate for ensuring optimal resource usage [61].”

    From Edge-Cloud Synergy for AI-Enhanced Sensor Network Data: A Real-Time Predictive Maintenance Framework (2024) · cites this paper as [61]

    The Conclusions (p. 17) say the proposed framework supports greater efficiency and productivity, and the human-automation symbiosis table (p. 13) lists process optimization. The paper does not establish that the framework ensures optimal resource usage, so the citing sentence overstates what it supports. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Breque, M., L. De Nul, and A. Petridis 2021. 'Industry 5.0: Towards a Sustainable, Human-Centric and Resilient European Industry, EC DG for Research and Innovation.' https://doi.org/10.2777/308407. · DOI
  2. Krupitzer, C., S. Müller, V. Lesch, M. Züfle, J. Edinger, A. Lemken, D. Schäfer, S. Kounev, and C. Becker. 2020. 'A Survey on Human Machine Interaction in Industry 4.0.' HumanComputer Interaction 1 (1): 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 1122445.1122456.
  3. Renda, A., S. Schwaag Serger, D. Tataj, A. Morlet, D. Isaksson, F. Martins, M. Mir Roca, C. Hidalgo, A. Huang, S. DixsonDeclève, P.-A. Balland, F. Bria, C. Charveriat, K. Dunlop, and E. Giovannini. 2022. 'Industry 5.0, a Transformative Vision for Europe - Governing Systemic Transformations Towards a Sustainable Industry, EC DG for Research and Innovation.' https://doi.org/10.2777/17322. · DOI
  4. Tzafestas, S. 2006. 'Concerning Human-Automation Symbiosis in the Society and the Nature.' International Journal of Factory Automation, Robotics and Soft Computing 1 (3): 6-24. van der Valk, H., H. Haße, F. Möller, M. Arbter, J. L. Henning, and B. Otto. 2020. 'A Taxonomy of Digital Twins.' In Proceedings of 26th Americas Conference on Information Systems , edited by B. Anderson, J. Thatcher, and R. Meservy pp. 1-10.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peruzzini, M., Prati, E., & Pellicciari, M.
Affiliations
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
Corresponding author
Peruzzini, Margherita
Venue
International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing
Published
2023-09-20
Volume
37
Issue
10-11
Pages
1426-1443
ISSN
  • 0951-192X (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3052
OpenAlex
W4386892322
Cited by
100
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 1
FWCI
13.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
H2020 Industrial Leadership (958303)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Keywords
Industry 5.0, smart manufacturing systems, human-machine collaboration, human-centric manufacturing, employee well-being, human-machine interaction, design framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review