CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 135Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessMulti-Criteria Decision Making

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating the human resource related soft dimensions in green supply chain management implementation

Open access
Kumar, Anil, Mangla, Sachin Kumar, Luthra, Sunil, Ishizaka, Alessio·2019·Production Planning & Control
DOI 10.1080/09537287.2018.1555342
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Because of increased carbon emissions, environmental protection initiatives have gained significant attention at global level. One of the major initiatives taken by the industrial sector to minimize the negative environmental effect of the value chain activities is Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM). In industry, soft (human resource-related) dimensions influence the implementation of GSCM process greatly. In the literature, relatively less discussion is provided on assessing the significance of soft dimensions in efficient GSCM acceptance in industry. The present work is an attempt to construct a structural framework for assessing the significance of the soft dimensions in adopting GSCM concepts by taking a case of automotive company in India. A hybrid approach of Best Worst Method (BWM) and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) approach is employed in this work. BWM is used to prioritize the GSCM oriented soft dimensions, and DEMATEL is employed to extract interrelationships among them. The result shows that ‘Top management commitment’, ‘Employee involvement’, ‘Organizational culture’ and ‘Teamwork’ are the highly prioritized causal soft dimensions in efficient GSCM adoption. This research work would help industry managers and practitioners to decide where to concentrate for GSCM concepts in context of soft dimensions for sustainable business development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09537287.2018.1555342

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 86 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Gabus A., 1972, World Problems, An Invitation to Further Thought Within the Framework of DEMATEL
  2. Irajpour A., 2012, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2, 8952
  3. Luthra S., 2015, Production Planning & Control, 26, 339
  4. Sweeney E, 2013, Supply Chain Management: Perspectives, Issues and Cases, 73

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–135 of 135

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, A., Mangla, S. K., Luthra, S., & Ishizaka, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Derby (GB)
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Government Engineering College, Nilokeri, India;
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Mangla, Sachin Kumar
ORCID
Venue
Production Planning & Control
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2019-04-25
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
699-715
ISSN
  • 0953-7287 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5871
DOI
10.1080/09537287.2018.1555342
OpenAlex
W2901339027
Cited by
135
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7
FWCI
24.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Production Planning & Control (publishedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Keywords
green supply chain management, human resource management, top management commitment, employee participation, organizational culture, teamwork, sustainable business development, automotive industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review