Cited by 82Intellectual Property and PatentsInnovation and Knowledge ManagementUniversity-Industry-Government Innovation Models

Large Firms and Knowledge Flows in the Dutch R&D System: A Case Study of Philips Electronics

Verspagen, Bart·1999·Technology Analysis & Strategic Management

Abstract

This paper uses data on patent-to-patent citations and patent-to-science-literature citations to study the spillover network of companies and research institutes around Philips Electronics. The theoretical section of the paper surveys the literature on innovation regimes and regional systems of innovation, and uses this to derive a number of testable hypotheses on the Philips network. The main findings of the paper are that the importance of local firms in the technology network around Philips is small, but the impact of local (semi-)public institutes is larger. Also, it is found that large firms generate a large part of the scientific literature that is referred to in Philips patents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/095373299107519

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Science partners tend to be most important where the innovation is relatively radical in orientation.

    “The evidence demonstrates that science partners tend to be most important where the innovation is relatively radical in orientation (Ebadi and Utterback, 1984;Verspagen, 1999;Fritsch, 2001).”

    From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Verspagen, 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verspagen, B.
Corresponding author
Verspagen, Bart
Venue
Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
Published
1999-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
211-233
ISSN
  • 0953-7325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3990
OpenAlex
W2116955000
Cited by
82
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technology Analysis and Strategic Management (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Keywords
knowledge flows, R&D system, Philips, patent citations, innovation regimes, large corporations, technology spillovers, innovation networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review