Cited by 13Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Systematic review of involuntary hospitalisation and long-term compliance

Open access
Cossu, Giulia, Gyppaz, Davide, Kalcev, Goce, Manca, Anna Rafaela, Angermeyer, Matthias, Zreik, Thurayya, Carta, Mauro G.·2023·International Review of Psychiatry

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Involuntary hospitalisation denies autonomy and freedom of decision-making and is frequent in psychiatric clinical practice. However, there is still a lack of knowledge of long-term compliance after Involuntary commitment. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of published studies reporting people compliance after involuntary hospitalisation and people compliance after voluntary admission. Two investigators independently searched PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE and CINAHL up to December 17th, 2021 to identify eligible studies. The study is registered with PROSPERO number CRD42022299437. RESULTS: Ten independent studies analysing the main indicators of compliance, engagement with services and medication adherence, were included. Three studies show that compliance is worse in people that have been involuntary hospitalised and in the others no association is found. Just two of the ten studies show an association with improved compliance. Outcomes are assessed from the first follow-up appointment after discharge up to 96 months. CONCLUSIONS: Although evidences carried out so far are weak, the data do not show a trend of improvements and do not seem to exclude the possibility of worse compliance after compulsory hospitalisation. More appropriate methodologies and reliable assessment are needed in future research to provide scientific evidence on involuntary admission health effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09540261.2022.2119074

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1.  Chaudri, N. A. (2004). Adherence to long-term therapies evidence for action. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 24(3), 221-222.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cossu, G., Gyppaz, D., Kalcev, G., Manca, A. R., Angermeyer, M., Zreik, T., & Carta, M. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Cagliari (IT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Degree program in medicine and surgery, University of Cagliari
  • Center for Public Mental Health
  • Research Consultant, Mental Health Service User Association
Corresponding author
Cossu, Giulia
Venue
International Review of Psychiatry
Published
2022-09-29
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
209-220
ISSN
  • 0954-0261 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-1627
OpenAlex
W4297982719
Cited by
13
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
involuntary hospitalisation, involuntary admission, long-term compliance, medication adherence, voluntary admission, psychiatric inpatients, service engagement, post-discharge follow-up
MeSH terms
Involuntary Treatment, Hospitalization, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review