Cited by 48Medication Adherence and ComplianceSchizophrenia research and treatmentHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints

Risk Factors for Medication Non-Adherence in Patients with First Episode Schizophrenia and Related Disorders; A Prospective Five Year Follow-Up

de Haan, L., van Amelsvoort, T., Dingemans, P., Linszen, D.·2007·Pharmacopsychiatry

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study is to assess, prospectively, the relative contribution of baseline variables to long-term medication adherence in patients with a first episode of schizophrenia. METHODS: Consecutively admitted patients suffering from a first episode of schizophrenia or related disorders were investigated. Subjective experience, attitudes towards treatment, insight, interaction with members of staff, involuntary admission, substance abuse, and severity of psychopathology were independently assessed at first admission and related to medication adherence during five year follow up. RESULTS: Standard multiple regression analysis revealed that hostility and uncooperativeness (p=0.007) and involuntary admission (p=0.02) were associated with the level of adherence during 5 year follow-up after admission. DISCUSSION: In first episode schizophrenia and related disorders, the initial interaction with staff and involuntary admission partly predicts long-term adherence to antipsychotic medication. Ameliorating these initial interactions might have long-term consequences on medication adherence. Involuntary admitted patients need intensive outpatient care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2007-992141

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There was no association between legal status or perceived coercion and adherence to treatment plans.

    “By contrast, two studies found no association between legal status or perceived coercion and adherence to treatment plans (38,39), or medication as measured by blood levels over two years (22).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Haan, L., van Amelsvoort, T., Dingemans, P., & Linszen, D.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Pharmacopsychiatry
Published
2007-11
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
264-268
ISSN
  • 0176-3679 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-0795
OpenAlex
W1980143549
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacopsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Keywords
medication non-adherence, antipsychotic drugs, first-episode schizophrenia, risk factors, hostility, involuntary admission, staff-patient interaction, treatment attitudes, insight, substance abuse, psychopathology severity, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Sex Factors, Antipsychotic Agents, Treatment Refusal, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review