Cited by 135Phonetics and Phonology ResearchLanguage Development and DisordersCategorization, perception, and language

First and second language vowel perception in early bilinguals

Bosch, Laura, Costa, Albert, Sebastián-Gallés, Núria·2000·European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the perception of speech sounds is strongly influenced by the internal structure of maternal language categories. Specifically, it has been shown that stimuli judged as good exemplars of a phonemic category are more difficult to discriminate from similar sounds than bad exemplars from equally similar sounds. This effect seems to be restricted to phonemes present in the maternal language, and is acquired in the first months of life. The present study investigates the malleability of speech acquisition by analysing the discrimination capacities for L2 phonemes in highly proficient Spanish-Catalan bilinguals born in monolingual families. In Experiment I subjects were required to give goodness of fit judgments to establish the best exemplars corresponding to three different vowel categories (Catalan /e/ and /ε/ Spanish /e/). In Experiments 2 and 3, bilinguals were asked to perform a discrimination task with materials in their maternal language (Exp. 2) and in their second language (Exp. 3). Results reveal that bilinguals show a reduced discrimination capacity only for good exemplars of their maternal language, but not for good exemplars of their second language. The same pattern of results was obtained in Experiment 4, using a within-subjects design and a bias-free discrimination measure (d'). These findings support the hypothesis that phonemic categories are not only acquired early in life, but under some circumstances, the acquisition of new phonemic categories can be seriously compromised, in spite of early and extensive exposure to L2.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09541446.2000.10590222

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Native-language phonetic prototypes evoke special responses compared with nonprototypes.

    “Many behavioral (63–69) and brain (70–73) studies indicate that native-language phonetic prototypes evoke special responses when compared with nonprototypes.”

    From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [66]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bosch, L., Costa, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N.
Venue
European Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Published
2000-06
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
189-221
ISSN
  • 0954-1446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0635
OpenAlex
W2146431174
Cited by
135
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
vowel perception, early bilinguals, phonemic categories, exemplar-based categorization, speech discrimination, Catalan-Spanish bilinguals, mother tongue, phoneme acquisition, language transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review