Cited by 171Phonetics and Phonology ResearchLanguage Development and DisordersCategorization, perception, and language

A cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English-learning and German-learning infants

Polka, Linda, Bohn, Ocke-Schwen·1996·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

Studies of cross-language consonant discrimination have shown a shift from a language-general to a language-specific pattern during the first year of life. Recently, the same pattern of change was observed for English-speaking infants’ discrimination of two non-native vowel contrasts (Polka and Werker, 1994). The present study was designed to provide a more direct assessment of language-specific influences on infant vowel contrast perception. In experiment 1 adults were tested on a German (non-English) contrast, /dut/ versus /dyt/, and an English (non-German) contrast, /dεt/ versus /dæt/. English and German adults discriminated both contrasts with high levels of accuracy in a categorial AXB task. However, results of an identification and rating task showed that, within each non-native vowel contrast, one vowel perceptually matched a native vowel category better than the other. In experiment 2 discrimination of /dut/ versus /dyt/ and /dεt/ versus /dæt/ was examined in English- and German-learning infants in two age groups (6–8 months and 10–12 months) using the conditioned headturn procedure. English and German infants did not differ in their discrimination of either contrast and there were no age differences in discrimination of either contrast for the German or for the English infants. However, in both language groups at both ages, there were clear differences in performance related to the direction in which the vowel change was presented to the infants. For the German contrast, discrimination was significantly poorer when the contrast changed from /dut/ to /dyt/. For the English contrast, discrimination was significantly poorer when the contrast changed from /dæt/ to /dεt/. The directional asymmetries observed here and in other infant vowel studies point to a language-universal perceptual pattern which suggests that vowels produced with extreme articulatory postures serve as perceptual attractors in infant vowel perception.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.415884

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The initial perceptual biases shown by infants in tests of categorical perception, as well as asymmetries in perception seen in infancy, produce a contouring of the perceptual space that is universal.

    “The important point regarding development is that the initial perceptual biases shown by infants in tests of categorical perception (12–16), as well as asymmetries in perception seen in infancy (80, 81), produce a contouring of the perceptual space that is universal.”

    From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [80]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Polka, L., & Bohn, O.-S.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
1996-07-01
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
577-592
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W1981980357
Cited by
171
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
vowel discrimination, cross-linguistic comparison, English-learning infants, directional asymmetry, first language acquisition
MeSH terms
Adult, Germany, Humans, Infant, Language, Speech Acoustics, Speech Discrimination Tests, Speech Perception, Verbal Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review