Cited by 689Phonetics and Phonology ResearchCategorization, perception, and languageNeuroscience and Music Perception

An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English

Open access
Miyawaki, Kuniko, Jenkins, James J., Strange, Winifred, Liberman, Alvin M., Verbrugge, Robert, Fujimura, Osamu·1975·Perception & Psychophysics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03211209

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The categorical perception phenomenon is language-specific; Japanese adults failed to show a peak in discrimination at the phonetic boundary of an American English /ra-la/ series.

    “The phenomenon was language-specific; Japanese adults, for example, failed to show a peak in discrimination at the phonetic boundary of an American English/ra-la/series (as in “rake” vs. “lake”) (11).”

    From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [11]

  • When acquiring a second language, certain phonetic distinctions are notoriously difficult to master both in speech perception and production, as shown by the difficulty of the /r-l/ distinction for native speakers of Japanese even after training.

    “When acquiring a second language, certain phonetic distinctions are notoriously difficult to master both in speech perception and production, as shown, for example, by the difficulty of the /r-l/ distinction for native speakers of Japanese, even after training (11, 78, 111, 112).”

    From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [11]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. ABRAMSON, A. S., & USDR, L. Discriminability along the voicing continuum: Cross-language tests. In Proceedings of the 6th International Con,ress of Phonetic Sciences (Prague, 1967). Prague: Academia, 1970. Pp. 569•573.
  2. EIMAS, P. D. Developmental aspects of speech perception. In R. Held, H. Leibowitz, & H. L. Teuber (Eds.), Handbook of sensory physiology. New York: Springer-Verlag, in press.
  3. HEFFNER, R.-M. S. General phonetics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1952.
  4. JONES, D. An outline of English phonetics. Cambridge Mass: Hefter, 1956.
  5. MIYAWAKI, K. A study of lingual articulation by use of dynamic palatography. Masters thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Tokyo, March 1973.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miyawaki, K., Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., Liberman, A. M., Verbrugge, R., & Fujimura, O.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Haskins Laboratories (US)
Venue
Perception & Psychophysics
Published
1975-09
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
331-340
ISSN
  • 0031-5117 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5962
OpenAlex
W2062956221
Cited by
689
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19-24)
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
third formant, formant transitions, speech perception, language experience, Japanese speakers, English speakers, phonemic contrasts, categorical perception, synthetic speech stimuli

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review