Cited by 29Effects of Radiation ExposureSpaceflight effects on biologyRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry

Spaceflight medical countermeasures: a strategic approach for mitigating effects from solar particle events

Open access
Carnell, Lisa S.·2021·International Journal of Radiation Biology

Abstract

NASA was recently charged with returning humans to the lunar surface within the next five years. This will require preparation for spaceflight missions of longer distance and duration than ever performed in the past. Protecting the crew and mission from the hazards associated with spaceflight will be a priority. One of the primary hazards to address is the challenging radiation environment. Space is unforgiving when it comes to radiation. There is galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) that is pervasive in space and the possibility of solar particle events (SPE) that release high energy particles from the sun that can result in high doses of radiation to the crew if unprotected. NASA has been preparing and evaluating several means of ensuring that crew health is not compromised during these missions. Physical shielding, space weather monitoring, and more recently storm shelters are all possible means of protecting crew during a SPE. Medical countermeasures have not been necessary for operations in low Earth orbit; however, future human exploration missions should consider including therapies onboard to address radiation-induced health effects. While the likelihood of experiencing a significant SPE is very low, serious adverse health effects or even death could occur if no medical countermeasures were available. Having a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved medical countermeasure on board that could mitigate acute radiation-induced hematopoietic syndrome due to a SPE could provide life saving measures for the crew. This paper discusses the mitigation strategies that can be implemented for Artemis missions and identifies numerous areas of research for future improvements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09553002.2020.1820603

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In this dose range, acute radiation syndrome with the hematopoietic system as main target can be expected.

    “In this dose range, acute radiation syndrome with the hematopoietic system as main target can be expected31.”

    From Towards sustainable human space exploration—priorities for radiation research to quantify and mitigate radiation risks (2023) · cites this paper as [31]

    The “Treatments for hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS)” section says H-ARS can occur at relatively low doses and that bone marrow may be compromised at doses as low as 0.5 Gy. It describes H-ARS as a concern, however, rather than establishing that it can be expected throughout the unspecified dose range in the citing sentence. The supplied copy does not give a page number for this passage. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Marshburn TH. 2008. Acute care. In: Barrat MR and Pool SL, editors. Principles of clinical medicine for space flight. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; p. 101-123.
  2. NPR 8900.1A Appendix D: Transition to Operations Review Process (TORP). 2016 (Dec 16). NASA Procedural Requirements: NASA Health and Medical Requirements for Human Space Exploration.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carnell, L. S.
Affiliations
Langley Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Carnell, Lisa S.
Venue
International Journal of Radiation Biology
Published
2020-10-14
Volume
97
Issue
sup1
Pages
S125-S131
ISSN
  • 0955-3002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3095
OpenAlex
W3087623106
Cited by
29
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Radiation Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Keywords
solar energetic particle events, medical countermeasures, space radiation, galactic cosmic rays, Artemis missions, lunar exploration, space weather monitoring, radiation shielding, storm shelters, FDA-approved therapies
MeSH terms
Medical Countermeasures, Cosmic Radiation, Humans, Radiation Dosage, Space Flight, Solar Activity, Acute Radiation Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review