The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cell Kinetics and Radiation Biology
Abstract
The cell cycle, the growth fraction and cell loss influence the response of cells to radiation in many ways. The variation in radiosensitivity around the cell cycle, and the extent of radiation-induced delay in cell cycle progression have both been clearly demonstrated in vitro. This translates into a variable time of expression of radiation injury in different normal tissues, ranging from a few days in intestine to weeks, months or even years in slowly proliferating tissues like lung, kidney, bladder and spinal cord. The radiosensitivity of tumours, to single doses, is dominated by hypoxic cells which arise from the imbalance between tumour cell production and the proliferation and branching of the blood vessels needed to bring oxygen and other nutrients to each cell. The response to fractionated radiation schedules is also influenced by the cell kinetic parameters of the cells comprising each tissue or tumour. This is described in terms of repair, redistribution, reoxygenation and repopulation. Slowly cycling cells show much more curved underlying cell survival curves, leading to more dramatic changes with fractionation, dose rate or l.e.t. Rapidly cycling cells redistribute around the cell cycle when the cells in sensitive phases have been killed, and experience less mitotic delay than slowly proliferating cells. Reoxygenation seems more effective in tumours with rapidly cycling cells and high natural cell loss rates. Compensatory repopulation within a treatment schedule may spare skin and mucosa but does not spare slowly proliferating tissues. Furthermore, tumour cell proliferation during fractionated radiotherapy may be an important factor limiting the overall success of treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Endothelial-cell proliferation in experimental tumours
Denekamp, J., & Hobson, B. (1982) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1982.263 · Cited by 237
Self-citation
Cited by
Pleiotropic effects of HIF-1 blockade on tumor radiosensitivity
Moeller, B. J., Dreher, M. R., Rabbani, Z. N., Schroeder, T., Cao, Y., Li, C. Y., & Dewhirst, M. W. (2005) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2005.06.016 · Cited by 374
(1993) · PubMed · Cited by 323
Overgaard, J., Hjelm-Hansen, M., Johansen, L. V., & Andersen, A. P. (1988) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.3109/02841868809090334 · Cited by 256
Zimmerman, M. A., Huang, Q., Li, F., Liu, X., & Li, C.-Y. (2013) · Seminars in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.semradonc.2013.05.003 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Denekamp, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1986-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 357-380
- ISSN
- 0020-7616 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077590126
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell Kinetics and Radiation Biology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09553008514552591
- The paper
- Denekamp, J. (1986). Cell Kinetics and Radiation Biology. International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553008514552591
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.