Cited by 1,204Effects of Radiation ExposureRadiation Therapy and DosimetryDNA Repair Mechanisms

Initial Events in the Cellular Effects of Ionizing Radiations: Clustered Damage in DNA

Goodhead, D.T.·1994·International Journal of Radiation Biology

Abstract

General correlations are found between the detailed spatial and temporal nature of the initial physical features of radiation insult and the likelihood of final biological consequences. These persist despite the chain of physical, chemical and biological processes that eliminate the vast majority of the early damage. Details of the initial conditions should provide guidance to critical features of the most relevant early biological damage and subsequent repair. Ionizing radiations produce many hundreds of different simple chemical products in DNA and also multitudes of possible clustered combinations. The simple products, including single-strand breaks, tend to correlate poorly with biological effectiveness. Even for initial double-strand breaks, as a broad class, there is apparently little or no increase in yield with increasing ionization density, in contrast with the large rise in relative biological effectiveness for cellular effects. Track structure analysis has revealed that clustered DNA damage of severity greater than simple double-strand breaks is likely to occur at biologically relevant frequencies with all ionizing radiations. Studies are in progress to describe in more detail the chemical nature of these clustered lesions and to consider the implications for cellular repair. It has been hypothesized that there is reduced repair of the more severe examples and that the spectrum of lesions that dominate the final cellular consequences is heavily skewed towards the m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09553009414550021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DNA damage is a good indicator of radiation clustering properties and therefore of radiation quality.

    “Albeit not exhaustive of cellular endpoints, DNA damage is here chosen as a good indicator of radiation clustering properties and therefore of radiation quality.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodhead, D. T.
Affiliations
Medical Research Council (GB)
Corresponding author
Goodhead, D.T.
Venue
International Journal of Radiation Biology
Published
1994-01
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
7-17
ISSN
  • 0955-3002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3095
OpenAlex
W2019963243
Cited by
1,204
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 57
FWCI
18.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Radiation Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Keywords
ionizing radiation, clustered DNA damage, DNA double-strand breaks, single-strand breaks, relative biological effectiveness, ionization density, DNA repair, radiation-induced DNA damage
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, DNA, DNA Damage, DNA, Single-Stranded, Humans, Relative Biological Effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review