Cited by 960Human Resource and Talent ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessEmployer Branding and e-HRM

Beyond strategic human resource management: is sustainable human resource management the next approach?

Kramar, Robin·2014·The International Journal of Human Resource Management

Abstract

Strategic human resource management (SHRM) emerged as a dominant approach to human resource management (HRM) policy during the past 30 years. However, during the last decade, a new approach to HRM has evolved. This approach has been labelled sustainable human resource management (sustainable HRM). It is an approach that seeks to link HRM and sustainability. The term sustainability is fraught with semantic difficulties, as is conceptualising its relationship to HRM. Consequently, sustainable HRM is viewed in a variety of ways. This paper examines the major features of SHRM, some of the meanings given to sustainability and the relationship between sustainability and HRM. It then outlines the major characteristics of sustainable HRM. Although there are a diversity of views about sustainable HRM, this approach has a number of features which differentiate it from SHRM. It acknowledges organisational outcomes, which are broader than financial outcomes. All the writings emphasise the importance of human and social outcomes. In addition, it explicitly identifies the negative as well as the positive effects of HRM on a variety of stakeholders; it pays further attention to the processes associated with the implementation of HRM policies and acknowledges the tensions in reconciling competing organisational requirements. Such an approach takes an explicit moral position about the desired outcomes of organisational practices in the short term and the long term. Sustainable HRM can be understood in terms of a number of complimentary frameworks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09585192.2013.816863

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kramar, R.
Affiliations
Australian Catholic University (AU)
Corresponding author
Kramar, Robin
Venue
The International Journal of Human Resource Management
Published
2013-07-16
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
1069-1089
ISSN
  • 0958-5192 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4399
OpenAlex
W1977681154
Cited by
960
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 130 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1
FWCI
30.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Human Resource Management (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
Keywords
sustainable human resource management, strategic human resource management, sustainability, organizational outcomes, stakeholder impact, sustainability framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review