The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recovery of real dye bath wastewater using integrated membrane process: considering water recovery, membrane fouling and reuse potential of membranes
Abstract
It has been recognized by the whole world that textile industry which produce large amounts of wastewater with strong color and toxic organic compounds is a major problematical industry requiring effective treatment solutions. In this study, reverse osmosis (RO) membranes were tested on biologically treated real dye bath wastewater with and without pretreatment by nanofiltration (NF) membrane to recovery. Also membrane fouling and reuse potential of membranes were investigated by multiple filtrations. Obtained results showed that only NF is not suitable to produce enough quality to reuse the wastewater in a textile industry as process water while RO provide successfully enough permeate quality. The results recommend that integrated NF/RO membrane process is able to reduce membrane fouling and allow long-term operation for real dye bath wastewater.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nanofiltration demonstrates remarkable efficacy in the removal of heavy metals.
“NF is a very sophisticated membrane-based technique that demonstrates remarkable efficacy in the removal of heavy metals [236][237][238].”
From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [237]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1007/BF03326283 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1383-5866(02)00177-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.desal.2009.05.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.542 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.desal.2013.02.011 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1478-4408.2007.00080.x · DOI
- 10.1002/jctb.904 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.055 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.desal.2012.04.022 · DOI
- Allegre C, 2006, J Biosci, 269, 15
- 10.1016/j.desal.2005.10.042 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cej.2013.07.061 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.025 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.151 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.01.065 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.085 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.022 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.desal.2005.05.030 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.desal.2004.11.043 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00209-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.11.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.desal.2012.05.019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.044 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.04.130 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.desal.2008.04.046 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Periyasamy, A. P. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16020495 · Cited by 652
Kaushal, J., Mahajan, P., & Kaur, N. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-16672-7 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Balcik-Canbolat, C., Sengezer, C., Sakar, H., Karagunduz, A., & Keskinler, B.
- Affiliations
- Department of Environmental Engineering, Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli, Turkey
- Venue
- Environmental Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-12-30
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 2668-2676
- ISSN
- 0959-3330
- 1479-487X
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu (TUBITAK) (114Y098)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
