The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cue utilization to assess food product quality: A comparison of consumers and retailers in India
Abstract
Using structural equation modeling, a cue utilization model was developed to compare Indian consumers' use of product cues and retailers' perception on their consumers' cue utilization in evaluating the quality of processed foods. Comparing 307 Indian consumers and 89 food retailers located in rural and urban India, the results reveal that intrinsic cues (taste and freshness) are more important than extrinsic cues (price, packaging, and brand name) in determining Indian consumers' overall quality perceptions of processed food products. The extrinsic cues, on the other hand, were used to evaluate Indian consumers' perceptions of the intrinsic cues. Results from a two-group comparison indicate that Indian food retailers overestimate the importance of price when consumers evaluate overall food quality, and overstate the importance of brand when consumers assess nutrition and freshness in foods, but underestimate the importance of brand when consumers assess taste. Marketing implications are provided.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Often, intrinsic quality cues (e.g., taste, color, freshness) were found to be much more relevant than the external ones (price, brand, packaging) in determining consumers’ overall quality perceptions of food products [45].”
From Consumer Understanding of Food Quality, Healthiness, and Environmental Impact: A Cross-National Perspective (2019) · cites this paper as [45]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 2001, Business Line, 24, 6
- 2003, MMR, 20, 14
- Assael H., 1992, Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action,
- Chandran R., 2005, Yahoo India News
- Cox D. F., 1967, Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior
- 10.1007/BF02723374 · DOI
- Davis L. L., 1985, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 671, 10.2466/pms.1985.61.2.671 · DOI
- 10.1509/jmkg.65.4.33.18386 · DOI · Paper page
- Douglas S., 1983, International Marketing Research
- 10.2307/1251524 · DOI
- 10.1086/209169 · DOI
- 10.1108/EUM0000000004662 · DOI
- Lee M., 1995, Journal of Applied Business Research, 12, 21, 10.19030/jabr.v12i1.5833 · DOI
- Nevid J. S., 1981, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 53, 407, 10.2466/pms.1981.53.2.407 · DOI
- Olson, J. C. 1972. “>Cue utilization in the quality perception process: a cognitive model and an empirical test, Doctoral dissertation”. Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University.
- 10.1086/208859 · DOI · Paper page
- Purwar P. C., 1982, The role of price cue in product quality perception: a comprehensive model and an empirical investigation, Doctoral dissertation
- Pysarchik D., 1999, Marketing News, 33, 12
- Pysarchik D., 1999, Marketing News, 33, 14
- 10.1086/209162 · DOI
- 10.2307/1251914 · DOI
- 10.1177/0266242697154004 · DOI
- 10.1016/0148-2963(93)90018-K · DOI
- Schellinck D. A., 1980, Determinants of cue choice behavior Doctoral dissertation
- 10.1080/09593969200000003 · DOI
- 10.1108/09590550410558626 · DOI
- 10.1016/0148-2963(90)90019-A · DOI
- 2003, GAIN Report #IN9054
- 2005, GAIN Report #IN5031
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Petrescu, D. C., Vermeir, I., & Petrescu-Mag, R. M. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17010169 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Chung, J.-E., Pil Yu, J., & Thorndike Pysarchik, D.
- Affiliations
- Ohio University (US)
- ORCID
- Chung, Jae-Eun
- Venue
- The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-214
- ISSN
- 0959-3969 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4402
- OpenAlex
- W1977441646
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
- Keywords
- cue utilization, food quality perception, processed foods, intrinsic cues, external cues, price cues, brand cues, taste, freshness, nutrition perception, rural and urban consumers, Indian consumers, food retailers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cue utilization to assess food product quality: A comparison of consumers and retailers in India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09593960600572233
- The paper
- Chung, J.-E., Pil Yu, J., & Thorndike Pysarchik, D. (2006). Cue utilization to assess food product quality: A comparison of consumers and retailers in India. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593960600572233