Cited by 290Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

The impact of therapeutic alliance in physical therapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review of the literature

Kinney, Meredith, Seider, Jasmine, Beaty, Amanda Floyd, Coughlin, Kaitlin, Dyal, Maximilian, Clewley, Derek·2020·Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

Abstract

Objective To systematically determine the specific impact of therapeutic alliance (TA) on chronic musculoskeletal pain, identify factors influencing TA between physical therapists and patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, and determine the working definition of TA across studies. Data Sources: Databases, including PubMed, CINHAL, and Embase, were searched from inception to January 2017. Study Selection: The initial search resulted in 451 papers. After screening, seven studies were identified that examined the role of TA on chronic pain (> 12 weeks) management in physical therapy settings. Data Extraction: Authors extracted data into tables. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration methodology. Data Synthesis: Three studies examined the influence of a strong TA coupled with physical therapy on pain outcomes. Four studies identified factors that positively and negatively influenced TA. The working definition of TA was identified in each study. Conclusions: Emerging evidence suggests that for individuals participating in physical therapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain, a strong TA may improve pain outcomes. In order to facilitate a strong TA, physical therapists must understand factors that positively and negatively influence the relationship. Studies demonstrate that the definition of TA remains consistent as it transitions to the physical therapy setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09593985.2018.1516015

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kinney, M., Seider, J., Beaty, A. F., Coughlin, K., Dyal, M., & Clewley, D.
Affiliations
  • Outpatient Physical Therapy Department, BreakThrough Physical Therapy, Wake Forest, NC, USA
  • Outpatient Physical Therapy Department, Select Physical Therapy, Arlington, VA, USA
  • Duke University Health System (US)
  • Outpatient Physical Therapy Department, Back to Work Physical Therapy, Tampa, FL, USA
  • Outpatient Physical Therapy Department, Korunda Medical LLC, Naples, FL, USA
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Kinney, Meredith
Venue
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
Published
2018-09-28
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
886-898
ISSN
  • 0959-3985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5040
OpenAlex
W2894436594
Cited by
290
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiotherapy Theory and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
therapeutic relationship, chronic musculoskeletal pain, physiotherapy, pain outcomes
MeSH terms
Therapeutic Alliance, Humans, Physical Therapy Modalities, Musculoskeletal Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review