Cited by 12Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesCrime, Deviance, and Social ControlStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

Exposing patterns of adult solicitor behaviour: towards a theory of control within the cybersexual abuse of youth

Barber, Connie S, Bettez, Silvia Cristina·2021·European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

The online solicitation of youth has been established as an unintended consequence of the connectedness afforded individuals through computer-mediated conversation. Information systems research focused on the behavioural patterns of online solicitors of youth is scant and lacks a strong theoretical foundation. We address this gap through an evolved grounded theory analysis of 90 Perverted Justice transcripts to extract the behavioural patterns that emerge when online solicitors use instant messaging to enact behaviours of grooming, predation, offending, and control. The aims of the research are: (1) delineate between grooming behaviour, predatory behaviour, and offending behaviour; (2) differentiate between passive and controlling solicitor language; (3) disentangle these behaviours from what the technology permits; (4) extend the current understanding of cybersexual abuse to show grooming as only one aspect of a phenomenon that also includes predation and offence; and (5) identify how these results are important for academics and software developers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0960085x.2020.1816146

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barber, C. S., & Bettez, S. C.
Affiliations
  • Southern Illinois University Edwardsville (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Corresponding author
Barber, Connie S
Venue
European Journal of Information Systems
Published
2020-09-13
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
591-622
ISSN
  • 0960-085X (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-9344
OpenAlex
W3085731510
Cited by
12
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
grooming, predatory behavior, offending, control, instant messaging, computer-mediated communication, online child sexual exploitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review