Exposing patterns of adult solicitor behaviour: towards a theory of control within the cybersexual abuse of youth
Abstract
The online solicitation of youth has been established as an unintended consequence of the connectedness afforded individuals through computer-mediated conversation. Information systems research focused on the behavioural patterns of online solicitors of youth is scant and lacks a strong theoretical foundation. We address this gap through an evolved grounded theory analysis of 90 Perverted Justice transcripts to extract the behavioural patterns that emerge when online solicitors use instant messaging to enact behaviours of grooming, predation, offending, and control. The aims of the research are: (1) delineate between grooming behaviour, predatory behaviour, and offending behaviour; (2) differentiate between passive and controlling solicitor language; (3) disentangle these behaviours from what the technology permits; (4) extend the current understanding of cybersexual abuse to show grooming as only one aspect of a phenomenon that also includes predation and offence; and (5) identify how these results are important for academics and software developers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Cyberbullying Versus Face-to-Face Bullying: A Theoretical and Conceptual Review
Dooley, J. J., Pyżalski, J., & Cross, D. (2009) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.182 · Cited by 790 · see citing works
Youth Internet Users at Risk for the Most Serious Online Sexual Solicitations
MITCHELL, K., FINKELHOR, D., & WOLAK, J. (2007) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.001 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Identifying sexual grooming themes used by internet sex offenders
Williams, R., Elliott, I. A., & Beech, A. R. (2013) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2012.707550 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Understanding grooming discourse in computer-mediated environments
Lorenzo-Dus, N., Izura, C., & Pérez-Tattam, R. (2016) · Discourse, Context & Media · doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2016.02.004 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Victims’ Voices: The Impact of Online Grooming and Sexual Abuse
C. Whittle, H., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., & R. Beech, A. (2013) · Universal Journal of Psychology · doi:10.13189/ujp.2013.010206 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Detecting child grooming behaviour patterns on social media
Cano, A. E., Fernandez, M., & Alani, H. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_30 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Shannon, D. (2008) · Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention · doi:10.1080/14043850802450120 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Detecting predatory behavior in game chats
Cheong, Y.-G., Jensen, A. K., Gudnadottir, E. R., Bae, B.-C., & Togelius, J. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games · doi:10.1109/tciaig.2015.2424932 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Offender strategies for engaging children in online sexual activity
Joleby, M., Lunde, C., Landström, S., & Jonsson, L. S. (2021) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105214 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“Barber and Bettez, 2020 Identify behavioral patterns of adult solicitor behavior.”
InfluentialMoosburner, M., Weber, C., Kuban, T., Wachs, S., Schmidt, A. F., Etzler, S., & Rettenberger, M. (2026) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380251316223 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Reneses, M., Riberas-Gutiérrez, M., & Bueno-Guerra, N. (2024) · Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2024-4-3 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Barber, C. S., & Bettez, S. C.
- Affiliations
- Southern Illinois University Edwardsville (US)
- University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barber, Connie S
- Venue
- European Journal of Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-09-13
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 591-622
- ISSN
- 0960-085X (ISSN-L)
- 1476-9344
- OpenAlex
- W3085731510
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Keywords
- grooming, predatory behavior, offending, control, instant messaging, computer-mediated communication, online child sexual exploitation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review