Cited by 268Sustainable Industrial EcologySustainable Design and DevelopmentSustainable Building Design and Assessment

Toward a Resource‐Efficient Built Environment: A Literature Review and Conceptual Model

Ness, David A., Xing, Ke·2017·Journal of Industrial Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Amid continued growth in the building stock, the pursuit of sustainable buildings is dominated by a focus on carbon neutrality and green , often overlooking resource consumption and its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and planetary degradation. Accordingly, this article seeks to highlight the importance of a resource‐efficient built environment, which enables required functions to be delivered with less assets, and to put forward an approach toward this objective. In this regard, the circular economy (CE) concept seeks to extract more value from resources by using them for as long as possible, thereby increasing economic prosperity and employment while reducing waste, greenhouse emissions, and pollution. Thus far, application of CE principles has largely concentrated on the industrial sector, such as through industrial symbiosis and its extension to urban symbiosis/metabolism. Their application to cities and, in particular, the built environment has been limited and the body of literature is relatively undeveloped. Insight is offered into how this field of research might be developed and applied to enable a more resource‐efficient, low‐carbon built environment with socioeconomic benefits. It reviews literature on the CE and industrial ecology, their application to industrial and urban contexts, and the gaps pertaining to the building sector. A proposition for extending research and its application to the built environment is then put forward, encapsulated in a conceptual model. This is seen as an important first step in influencing policy makers and repositioning resource efficiency firmly on the sustainable and carbon neutral building agenda.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jiec.12586

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ness, D. A., & Xing, K.
Affiliations
University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Ness, David A.
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2017-04-21
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
572-592
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
OpenAlex
W2607304049
Cited by
268
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7
FWCI
17.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Sustainable Industrial Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Keywords
resource efficiency, built environment, circular economy, industrial ecology, urban metabolism, industrial symbiosis, urban symbiosis, sustainable construction, low-carbon buildings, greenhouse gas emissions, resource consumption, building stock, conceptual model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review